View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2016, 07:09 AM
Shootnride's Avatar
Shootnride Shootnride is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance, 427SO
Posts: 389
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark IV View Post
Maybe....maybe not.

We have asked the factory for a "removable crossmember" and have been told "No". They contend that the frame design of the MK III does not allow for any possibility of such an item and that the torsional rigidity will be compromised. And as further proof of their CAD design they DO put a removable member in the MK II (289) as the frame design in that model allows such a bolt in piece. The 289s have a round tube ladder type frame that differs from the AC supplied unit by both tube wall thickness and a triangular reinforcement inserted into the tube.

Do what you want but the people who designed the frame for the MK III say "don't do it"
Your point is well taken.
I can certainly understand why the factory wouldn't want owners doing their own crossmember fabrication, as they have no control over the quality of the work. I understand that it is much easier for them to attain the desired torsional rigidity by welding in the crossmember. I do believe that if "they" really wanted a removable crossmember they would come up with a good design. Not trying to pick a fight, just my opinion.

Ted
Reply With Quote