![]() |
Rear Main Seal Leak
I dropped the pan, partially to replace the leaking rear main seal, the remainder to install my new Armando's oil pan. I discovered two interesting things when I looked at the rear main bearing cap: 1) there was a half section of a rear main seal (Ford part # - perhaps the original one) laying loose in the slot between the bearing and the seal groove; and 2) the upper portion of the Fel-Pro seal was installed backwards - with the lip facing out, rather than in. The half section in the bearing cap was installed correctly, however.
Whoever replaced the original seal must have been in a big hurry, oblivious or just sloppy. Also, I realize the oil pan bolts are only torqued to 15 ft. lbs., but they seemed looser than that, and the rear main bearing bolts were suspiciously easy to remove as well - perhaps they didn't get the last pass when torquing in thirds. |
I'm guessin it's probably a good idea to re torque all the caps, to be safe.
|
Quote:
|
Sounds like you're good workmanship may have saved you a larger problem. When I discover something like that it throws the whole motor into question. How much history of the car do you have access to?
|
I would check with the seal manufacturer before you fit everything up.
Some seals do go in backwards. I've seen many now. I would also like to kick the engine assembler in the backside, what else did he do inside? |
Quote:
I do have contact information for the first owner and we had a good conversation last fall. For example, he was able to confirm the car had a hydraulic camshaft, while the lash was set as if it was a mechanical cam. He promised to send me an email with 'a million things' about the car, but he's an older gentleman and he hasn't been responding - so I'm a bit concerned about his health. |
Quote:
It looks like the engine had the pistons replaced, perhaps about the time the engine was installed (1990-1991), as I believe the marks on the underside of the pistons (9-1548 IND BRAS M-2) aren't consistent with what Ford would have used in 1973. The pistons have also been drilled, presumably to balance them. I can also see honing marks on the lower cylinder walls - within the range traveled by the pistons. I have not removed the heads to see the tops of the pistons, nor have I measured the cylinders to see if they've been bored. I am planning on purchasing an inspection camera to poke in the spark plug holes to see what's in there, though that obviously won't be as complete as pulling the heads - that will have to wait for later. |
Surprised the camshaft has survived.
Hydraulic cam lobes (base circle) are ground differently to solid cams. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: