Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   ALL COBRA TALK (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/)
-   -   Which is the best cobra manufacturer? (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/121911-best-cobra-manufacturer.html)

RodKnock 08-23-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lippy (Post 1258977)
Ironically there seems to be more agreement than disagreement on the prior posts that the top three are Kirkham, Shelby, and ERA.

And I think you have the order correct as well. :LOL:

patrickt 08-23-2013 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodKnock (Post 1258980)
And I think you have the order correct as well. :LOL:

Only in Arabic, Hebrew and Urdu.:cool:

kevins2 08-23-2013 12:32 PM

Actually, I was referring to the hotly debated original vs. replica thing...

patrickt 08-23-2013 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevins2 (Post 1258986)
Actually, I was referring to the hotly debated original vs. replica thing...

You know, I don't think there's anyone on this forum that takes Evan's position but him.

patrickt 08-23-2013 12:38 PM

... and I bet you didn't know Chas was fluent in Urdu, did you?

Tommy 08-23-2013 12:38 PM

REAL 1,
It's one thing to express an opinion as such. It's another to state an opinion and use the actions of the SAAC to claim it as a fact. The fact that the SAAC exists, it maintains a registry, and that registry includes some cars but not others does not make the cars it includes automatically more collectible, more valuable or more authentic than any others manufactured after 1967. What it likely reflects is that the SAAC must have permission from the Shelby Trust to use his name and the Trust wants the SAAC to include in its registry contemporary cars in which it has a financial interest. If Shelby American could make the right deal with FFR, it wouldn't surprise me a bit to see them added to the registry. So, I suggest you allow the market to determine the relative values of the various Cobra clones produced after 1967. Your claims that those recently manufactured cars listed in the SAAC registry are intrinsically more authentic than others comes across as either naive or self serving.

LMH 08-23-2013 12:45 PM

Oy vey!
Larry

phattyhales 08-23-2013 01:12 PM

Of the three everyone seems to have narrowed down, Kirkham, Shelby, and ERA, I prefer Kirkham. I work for them so I am not biased at all! ;). Not only have they maintained originality in just about every way they have also improved things like suspension and brakes from the originals. Most have more power to not that you'd need it. We just shipped off a car yesterday with a fuel injected, dry sump, 427 SOHC motor which produces somewhere in the neighborhood of 700-800hp.

RodKnock 08-23-2013 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phattyhales (Post 1258997)
We just shipped off a car yesterday with a fuel injected, dry sump, 427 SOHC motor which produces somewhere in the neighborhood of 700-800hp.

That's strange. I was just thinking of shipping 539 to you for you to install a SOHC engine and maybe a few other improvements. :eek: :LOL: **)

phattyhales 08-23-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodKnock (Post 1258999)
That's strange. I was just thinking of shipping 539 to you for you to install a SOHC engine and maybe a few other improvements. :eek: :LOL: **)

Give us a call man!!! lol
Here is the facebook link for it.

patrickt 08-23-2013 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phattyhales (Post 1259002)
Give us a call man!!! lol
Here is the facebook link for it.

He might as well... and you all could take your time. After all, he never drives the damn car anyway.:LOL:

RodKnock 08-23-2013 02:43 PM

And NOT driving it with a Cammer in it would be awesomer.

AL427SBF 08-23-2013 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lippy (Post 1258974)
This forum is mostly self-serving opinionated hyperbole, which is one of the reasons I like it.

... and one it which REAL 1 is an active participant in keeping it that way :)

REAL 1 08-23-2013 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodKnock (Post 1258968)
:CRY::CRY::CRY:

"Best" can be interpreted in many different ways. And the "self-serving" comment is also in it of itself "self-serving."

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodKnock (Post 1258973)
The book in which you refer to also specifically states that the continuation models offered by SAI are "true replicas."

The OP asked for opinions "on the top five manufacturers of the replicas." And that would include the Shelby Cobra continuation models.

And yes, your comments are self-serving, but that's OK. We all are to some extent. The OP just needs a Club Cobra Orientation Day so he can get squared away before posting to the forum.

Yes, another quote taken out of contex. Lol. No surprise. Keep reading my friend.

RodKnock 08-23-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REAL 1 (Post 1259015)
Yes, another quote taken out of contex. Lol. No surprise. Keep reading my friend.

It's not out of context. I don't have the World Registry in front of me, but as I remember, the caption says that "they" (SAAC) needed to call Shelby's "true replicas" something other than that and decided to call them "continuations."

REAL 1 08-23-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy (Post 1258990)
REAL 1,
It's one thing to express an opinion as such. It's another to state an opinion and use the actions of the SAAC to claim it as a fact. The fact that the SAAC exists, it maintains a registry, and that registry includes some cars but not others does not make the cars it includes automatically more collectible, more valuable or more authentic than any others manufactured after 1967. What it likely reflects is that the SAAC must have permission from the Shelby Trust to use his name and the Trust wants the SAAC to include in its registry contemporary cars in which it has a financial interest. If Shelby American could make the right deal with FFR, it wouldn't surprise me a bit to see them added to the registry. So, I suggest you allow the market to determine the relative values of the various Cobra clones produced after 1967. Your claims that those recently manufactured cars listed in the SAAC registry are intrinsically more authentic than others comes across as either naive or self serving.

Tommy: let's review.
1. The continuation Cobras are genuine Shelby Cobras. Fact.
2. No other manufacturer may represent or call their products "Cobras" or Shelby Cobras. Fact.
3. SAAC is the worlds leading authority on Cobras. Fact.
4. A major purpose of the Registry is to identify, catalog Cobras and to establish definitions defining what cars are considered by SAAC authentic "Cobras". Fact.

Your suppositions as why SAAC included some cars and not others remains your personal suppositions....to which you are entitled to have. They specifically and expressly provide definitions as to replica/kit vs. Cobras. You may not like their definitions and position but there you have it. I just happen to agree with them.

I said nothing about collectibility. That's a different discussion. However there is no doubt in my mind that Shelby continuation Cobras have a far better shot at being collectible than replicas and are more desirable finances permitting. That's MY Humble opinion to which I am entitled.

gsharapa 08-23-2013 03:44 PM

I have had 4 Superformance Cobras (Very Nice) 1 Kirkham FIA that was as close as it gets to an original 289 Comp Car and now an Exact. The Exact is very low volume with only 12 cars sold but dead nuts on to an original in carbon fiber! Very cool............

http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...m/Cobra149.JPG

Dimis 08-23-2013 03:54 PM

I'd have thought FFR are the "best". No?
They have sold far more than any of the others.
Possibly more than all others combined.
Popular opinion would therefore suggest that for the vast majority of cobra owners agree with me.

Else FWIW: I'm with rodknock

RodKnock 08-23-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REAL 1 (Post 1259021)
Tommy: let's review.
1. The continuation Cobras are genuine Shelby Cobras. Fact.
2. No other manufacturer may represent or call their products "Cobras" or Shelby Cobras. Fact.
3. SAAC is the worlds leading authority on Cobras. Fact.
4. A major purpose of the Registry is to identify, catalog Cobras and to establish definitions defining what cars are considered by SAAC authentic "Cobras". Fact.

Your suppositions as why SAAC included some cars and not others remains your personal suppositions....to which you are entitled to have. They specifically and expressly provide definitions as to replica/kit vs. Cobras. You may not like their definitions and position but there you have it. I just happen to agree with them.

I said nothing about collectibility. That's a different discussion. However there is no doubt in my mind that Shelby continuation Cobras have a far better shot at being collectible than replicas and are more desirable finances permitting. That's MY Humble opinion to which I am entitled.

And to the OP, Evan's diatribe doesn't necessarily make them (Shelby) the "best" Cobra replica on the market.

And Evan didn't mention that the Kirkham Cobra is also listed in the World Registry, but that doesn't necessarily make them the best Cobra either.

Now, back to the OP's original question.

In terms of Cobra replicas, "best" means TO ME that a Cobra must be:

1. aluminum bodied,
2. reasonably accurate to the 1960's original (originals were aluminum too),
3. built by a customer and engineering focused manufacturer, who truly desires to make their product better every day,
4. sold only by the manufacturer w/o middlemen, and
5. finished in the USA, in one location (UT) by the same people, since their 1994 beginning (i.e., product consistency).

What does "best" mean to you?

RodKnock 08-23-2013 04:19 PM

And I should not forget to add that but not for #1 in my list above, meaning a fiberglass-bodied replica works for you, then ERA would meet the other criteria.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: