Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   ALL COBRA TALK (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/)
-   -   Considering a Cobra have some questions (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/131970-considering-cobra-have-some-questions.html)

Bernica 12-23-2014 10:00 AM

Yup. Changing tires is like getting a new pair of shoes...you need to walk (or run) in them a while and get used to them.:cool:

patrickt 12-23-2014 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lippy (Post 1331233)
This entails WOT or close acceleration onto the highway for brief periods...

Past, say, a slow count to five?:confused:

kevins2 12-23-2014 10:33 AM

My engine dynoed at 482 HP at the flywheel and 502 ft.lbs. torque. I haven't had it dynoed in the car (plan to get it fine-tuned in the Spring) so no idea what's actually getting to the rear wheels. The car hooks up pretty well and pulls hard. I've broken the tires loose a few times shifting into 2nd. All but one of those times it just kept pulling straight and the tires grabbed again. Once, it got pretty loose and, although I didn't get sideways, I was close to losing it. Lesson learned - that stretch of road looked just like all the others when I hit second a bit hard. Won't do that again.

patrickt 12-23-2014 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevins2 (Post 1331240)
My engine dynoed at 482 HP at the flywheel and 502 ft.lbs. torque.

Personally, I think 450-500 HP at the flywheel is the magic sweet spot in these cars when they are not heavily raced. I don't think you get any noticeable benefit above those numbers.:cool:

Now, Bill... there's more to these engines than just the HP/Torque numbers. I had mine built with a shorter stroke (4.125") and with light weight Wiseco pistons, light weight aluminum flywheel, and what not, just so it would rev quickly with the old fashioned solid lifters, and old fashioned cam. All of that, not to make more power, but just because I like the sound and it's fun to do on occasion -- but still be drivable in stop and go traffic. Brent sometimes likes to poke good-natured fun at some of that, because he knows he could have built it differently and easily added 100+ horses to the mix. But, the choice is yours....:MECOOL:

blykins 12-23-2014 11:08 AM

No, I poke fun at you because you think a shorter stroke makes it rev faster....

patrickt 12-23-2014 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1331248)
No, I poke fun at you because you think a shorter stroke makes it rev faster....

... but you will admit that there is a "split of opinion" on that very issue among the "big three" engine builders on this forum, of which you are one.:cool:

blykins 12-23-2014 11:12 AM

Opinions are different than facts. David Brown's 496 with a 4.250" stroke crank would sound like an F1 car compared to yours... ;-)

patrickt 12-23-2014 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1331250)
Opinions are different than facts. David Brown's 496 with a 4.250" stroke crank would sound like an F1 car compared to yours... ;-)

... well hopefully Bill has you build him what he wants. You do very nice work.:)

blykins 12-23-2014 11:16 AM

I'm booked through the middle of next year....

But thanks.

patrickt 12-23-2014 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1331252)
I'm booked through the middle of next year....

But thanks.

Never turn down work --- just work harder. Remember, we want you to get rich on us, or at least moderately wealthy.:cool:

lippy 12-23-2014 11:21 AM

Brent, give us the lowdown on this topic if you don't mind. I also thought that, all else being equal (e.g., lightweight components), an oversquare engine revved better than an undersquare one, but undersquare had the torque advantage.

Bernica 12-23-2014 11:22 AM

I'm at around 500 / 500 at the flywheel with a mid-range cam and 482ci at 10.9:1 comp, which was done on purpose to allow room to grow if I ever got the itch. I sent my engine specs to Blykins and he verified I certainly have that capability, but I really do think I am just fine just as it is for now.;)

blykins 12-23-2014 11:30 AM

Lip,

Too many variables....but as in everything else, it's not wise to make generalizations.

Lots that go into engine acceleration: weight of rotating assembly, piston ring drag, external component weight (flywheel, clutch, etc.), and most importantly, how much power the engine makes. Take the engine off the dyno and stick it in the car, then you're working with even more variables....rearend ratios, trans ratios, exhaust, amount of air you're able to pull in, etc.

blykins 12-24-2014 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 601HP (Post 1331277)
Looking forward to some WOT in the spring with this Lykins 496!

David

Be very careful, sir....

AL427SBF 12-24-2014 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lippy (Post 1331254)
Brent, give us the lowdown on this topic if you don't mind. I also thought that, all else being equal (e.g., lightweight components), an oversquare engine revved better than an undersquare one, but undersquare had the torque advantage.

Bore to Stroke Ratio & Other Design Concerns
.

JoeT 12-24-2014 12:36 PM

I'm "only" at 400hp for my Factory five running goodyear F1's and IRS, and recently thought about selling for a 991TT. I drove the 991TT and although fast (very fast) it was no where near the feel of the FFR.

With the 991S having less power than the twin turbo version, I suggest finding someone local that will take out out in their car. I'd like to jump in power to 600hp, but the reality is that most of that would be lost in tire spin anyways. In 4th doing 60 a stomp on the skinny peddle easily breaks the rear free

If you were closer, I'd let you drive mine just to get the feel for "only" 400hp

Dimis 12-24-2014 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1331252)
I'm booked through the middle of next year....

But thanks.

More proof you're too cheap ;)


Quote:

Originally Posted by patrickt (Post 1331253)
Never turn down work --- just work harder

Or... Increase your margins a little and let the customer self select.

Work less but your bottom line would be the same ;)

Detroit Bill 12-24-2014 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeT (Post 1331431)
I'm "only" at 400hp for my Factory five running goodyear F1's and IRS, and recently thought about selling for a 991TT. I drove the 991TT and although fast (very fast) it was no where near the feel of the FFR.

With the 991S having less power than the twin turbo version, I suggest finding someone local that will take out out in their car. I'd like to jump in power to 600hp, but the reality is that most of that would be lost in tire spin anyways. In 4th doing 60 a stomp on the skinny peddle easily breaks the rear free

If you were closer, I'd let you drive mine just to get the feel for "only" 400hp

A 991 Twin Turbo (tt) is the other car on my list. I did have a photo of that car hanging on the wall when I was a kid. The problem is that that raises the bar in a difficult way. Now to feel like you are pushing the car you would have to do 120 in the turns. I am planning on trying to to take one for a ride before I make any decisions. Thanks for the sound advice.

lippy 12-24-2014 04:02 PM

A 991 TT is just a very different car. I like them both, but wouldn't consider a 991 TT as a substitute for a Cobra, or vice versa. Also, to be honest, I'd just as soon have an S coupe vs a TT.

RodKnock 12-24-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lippy (Post 1331449)
Also, to be honest, I'd just as soon have an S coupe vs a TT.

Lip, you should lie more often then. No on the TT? Wow. :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: