Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   Parts For Sale (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/parts-sale/)
-   -   SBF 289/302 Weber CROSSRAM! Is it true? (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/parts-sale/69782-sbf-289-302-weber-crossram-true.html)

DavidNJ 05-25-2006 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sizzler
The photo above of the DCOE's on a 289 is actually a picture of DCOE's mounted on two adapters on a 2x4 intake manifold. It is not a crossram.

If you want an injected crossram, you'd probably be better off with either an old BXR, if you can find one

http://ollavcom.nexpoint.net/natural...r/bxr_cov1.gif

http://ollavcom.nexpoint.net/naturalaspiration/bxr/

or, buy a new BBK injection manifold which solved the BXR's distributor issues

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

http://static.summitracing.com/globa...e/bbk-5001.jpg

This injection manifold has been available (for around $3,500) for a while. It's made for a 351C though...

http://www.asajay.com/oldasajay/pant.../crossram4.jpg

Two questions:

1. Who makes the 351C manifold? Do they have a website?

2. Why not use a TrickFlow R or other big chamber on a TrickFlow or other port injection base if you are going to use a single TB?

Aussie Mike 05-26-2006 03:06 AM

I think that last injection setup is made by Morrison (an Australian company) for the V8 Super car racing down here. They are for the Ford 5.0 Windsor motor, not the 351 Cleveland.

Mando, one of our Aussie member has one on his Cobra and there are a few others running around down here.

Here's Mandos all polished up and anodized and looking awesome.

http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...m/DSCF0270.jpg

Cheers

What'saCobra? 05-26-2006 06:03 AM

manny-fold
 
VWeb
Thanks for that. Makes more sense to these eyes. That SBF certainly doesn't want to suck on a set of 58's, so the step-down to 40's or so makes sense. Maybe the 40's are OK for the street, but for a racer-X they might be too small, inaddition to my other comments above. Was this intake really for SBF's or are they adapted from the MT SBC manifolds? i have forgotten if MT made them for the SBF and seem to think they didn't.

AUSM
Those are just beautiful artseyfartsey bits! They are the cat's asymptote. AND they clear the tall rocker boxes nicely. Who, where and how much, if you will?

Jim Kellogg 05-26-2006 10:33 AM

Never seen the M/T crossram before. It is a nice looking setup!! How was the performance compared to the (more common) IDA carbs and manifold?

Thought it was 2 Cannon?? adapters on a 2x4 manifold with the DCOE almost horizontal in the photo.

I have set up several DCOE carb systems in my shop back in the 70's, all on imports (Triumph, Datsun, ect).

Learning more about these cars every day,
Jim Kellogg
Elmira, NY

Mike Simard 05-26-2006 11:25 AM

There were also some cross ram 351C injected manifolds used here in the US. They were used on road race cars like Panoz, I thought that Saleen had something to do with them but am not sure, could they be related to that Aussie setup? There may be enough of them floating around to come up for sale some day. The Panoz factory has an engine with it on display in their lobby, true eye candy.
Vintageweber's idea of a crossram intake is a great idea and overdue. Having it clear the distributor is surprising, it's really hard to design a nice induction system that doesn't get in the way of the distributor as seen on that Aussie piece.

quickjack 05-26-2006 11:28 AM

Hmmm, can you say crank trigger?

Mike Simard 05-26-2006 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quickjack
Hmmm, can you say crank trigger?

Indeed. If you're using EFI it's simple to add one since you already have an ECU that could surely control spark as well. I use a Ford EDIS distributorless system, it's a blessing to gearheads in that it's a standalone system that handles dwell. It outputs a signal that most aftermarket ECUs can recieve, the ECU then handles timing and sends a signal to the EDIS. Of course most ECU's can send a signal directly to coils, the nice thing about EDIS is that it handles the dwell control and is a robust part.

Sizzler 05-26-2006 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Two questions:

1. Who makes the 351C manifold? Do they have a website?

2. Why not use a TrickFlow R or other big chamber on a TrickFlow or other port injection base if you are going to use a single TB?

I did not know Mickey Thompson made such a crossram for the 289, much less that is was for 58mm webers. About time that little piece of information made it to my synapses. I've seen that setup before and always assumed it was two of these adapters on a 2x4 intake
http://www.jameng.com/products/images/99004.011.jpg

1) As for the 351C crossram, I can only point you towards
Australian Muscle Parts
Australian phone number - 011-613-59402337
California Distribution phone number - 562-428-9764

Don't know if they're still in business or if that version is still produced. A lot of stuff sticks around on the web long after it's gone in real life. It IS for a 351C though.

2) Use whatever you want. It all depends on YOUR engine combination and projected usage. I've personally always liked the BXR, just for looks. It does need either DIS or a front drive distributor. Reading the comment above about the Ford EDIS, I am apparently seriously behind the times, because I did not know the EDIS was controllable by any other ECM other than Ford's own EECxx boxes.

As for injected crossrams. It's all a big moot point nowadays as even the factory 5.0 injection manifolds are basically crossrams; they have the long runners and deal with transition with injectors mounted at the ports. They're taller than the cleveland and mocked up windsor versions, and that's for the reasons already mentioned: valve cover clearance and simple access to injectors mounted at the ports instead of on top of the runners.

But the mock up is for a DCOE crossram, and it's about time.

Michael4yah 05-26-2006 12:21 PM

Anyone know where I can find a set of original 58s or hi rise manifolds?

Mike Simard 05-26-2006 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sizzler
Reading the comment above about the Ford EDIS, I am apparently seriously behind the times, because I did not know the EDIS was controllable by any other ECM other than Ford's own EECxx boxes.

The early years of EDIS consist of a module that sits on the fenderwell that everything is wired to, it sends a signal to the ECU and gets one back. In 96(?) EDIS was integrated into the ECU, you would look for the early ones with the seperate module. here's some info: http://www.dainst.com/info/edis/edis.html

What'saCobra? 05-26-2006 01:01 PM

Siz who?
 
Thanks for that address & no.

i would reserve judgement just yet that M/T made an SBF crossram for the 289. If someone wants to absolutely say so, that's fine, but most of M/T's stuff was Chevy supported and only for Chevy motors, particularly in the early days. Further, clearly a 58MM unit is way too much for a 289, unless it is sleeved down to just around or just over 40. Why do all that when the 40DCOE is cheaper and easier to find. 58's might be OK on a stroked W or a nice 427/8/9 something.

In later years, M/T did make FORD stuff also, but crossrams were early bits, way before Dominators and open plenums etc were so effective.

But, as you point out, we could have missed that fact somewhere in our cortex mush.

But, that polished crossram injector system is really beautiful.

vintagewebers 05-27-2006 08:05 AM

58's on a crossram
 
Here is a photo of the 58mm crossram I own with a set of sidedrafts. It's not as pretty as it could be but i'm still doing restoration work on the carbs. I don't know about you, but to me that is the ultimate sex appeal for the SBF.

http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...m/DSCN1419.jpg

*13* 05-27-2006 08:30 AM

Damn Sexy if ya ask me:3DSMILE:

Anthony 05-27-2006 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagewebers
Here is a photo of the 58mm crossram I own with a set of sidedrafts. It's not as pretty as it could be but i'm still doing restoration work on the carbs. I don't know about you, but to me that is the ultimate sex appeal for the SBF.

http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/d...m/DSCN1419.jpg

just curious, it's hard to see, but do the intake runners decrease in cross sectional area as they start from the carb base and pass to the opposite side of the intake, with most runners being sandwiched between two other runners? Or do the runners have equal cross sectional area the entire length?



Quote:

Originally Posted by What'saCobra?

Further, clearly a 58MM unit is way too much for a 289, .

I thought that somebody said that the weber 58mm downdrafts were developed for ford 289 "indy" engines, and I believe that several magazines in the early 1960's spotlighted these carbs/indy engines. obviously, I would think Indy engines run at WOT at max rpms, most of the time, at least at the Indy 500.

Weber has a chart that recommends a certain size carb based on engine size as well as max rpms. The higher rpm you run an engine, the bigger size weber carb you need.

What'saCobra? 05-27-2006 11:02 AM

58mm on a '289'
 
Ant
The Indy '289' is another whole kettle of fishes. Of course, it was really an all aly 255 in2 DOHC and turned perhaps 8000+rpm in good fettle. The 255 was also used in the initial GT40 MKI's, but was replaced rather quickly with 'normal' 289's because of poor torque coming out of corners, wacko costs and fussy to maintain...

That engine, no normal SBF, was no streeter or road racer with the 58's. If the rpm dropped under 4500 it was in big trouble. But, it could draw enough from 58's to work nicely at high rpm on an oval as long as speeds didn't get too slow.

My guess is that a modern stroker W with the best hi-flow heads available would 'use' the 58's to better effect, but it will take some work to get them to transition nicely and come off the line without popping/leaning or loading plugs at idle. Those sewer pipes aren't going to like just-off-idle air flows and will even make starting a pain on a small displacement engine.

Given that someone could do that work, wouldn't they be great lookin'?

Michael4yah 05-27-2006 04:38 PM

58s........ anyone know where I can find some original 58 IDA Webers?

*13* 05-27-2006 05:23 PM

I've been checking ebay but haven't seen anything. They seem to be a scarce vintage item

Badger 05-27-2006 06:57 PM

with the right chokes to increase low RPM velocity you may be able to get these 58s to work on the street. Good luck...that's a rare set up. Nice! Badger

Aussie Mike 05-27-2006 08:22 PM

Mando is running a crank trigger on his 347 so no distributor needed. I believe the morrison setup goes for about AU$7000 which is around $5K US.

I've found a couple of alternative manufacturers down here that are a fair bit cheaper. Hocking Racing Shop sell a kit for about AU$3500 that looks pretty good.

Katicore do a range of setups at reasonable prices. Ive seen their work first hand and it looks good. I bought some fuel rail extrusion from them to make my own fuel rails.

Harrop engineering also make a couple but the Ford one is a V8 Supercars masterpiece and has a $14000 price tag.

http://www.harrop.com.au/site_resour...age/1_main.jpg

Cheers

*13* 05-27-2006 11:29 PM

You can't show porn here!!! :p


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: