Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   Shop Talk (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/shop-talk/)
-   -   Dual Quad dilemma...too much carb? (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/shop-talk/74431-dual-quad-dilemma-too-much-carb.html)

SFM5S159 11-14-2006 06:28 AM

Dual Quad dilemma...too much carb?
 
Guys,
Does anyone have a suggestion regarding the use of an original BJ-BK 600 CFM dual quad setup for a good, practical driver? I drive a '67 GT500 soon to have a mild 428 w/Edelbrock heads. The stock dual quad set-up is too much carburation for the motor. How can I avoid dumping too much fuel into the motor and causing a rich condition and premature wear etc.?
I guess I could re-jet the carbs?
Any ideas would be welcome.
MC

blykins 11-14-2006 06:30 AM

Vacuum secondaries I assume?

I just dyno'd my 428FE with a pair of 725cfm Demons. A/F ratio was great all across the band.

But yes, you could jet down along with some other tricks.

Tommy 11-14-2006 07:01 AM

In case you didn't notice this thread: http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/shop-talk/74335-harm-overcarburetion.html

CobraV8 11-14-2006 09:05 AM

I run dual 600cfm Edelbrocks on my small block. I disconnected the secondaries, not because of overcarburation, but rather because the flapper valves would open too soon and cause a flat spot during accelleration. Anyway I wonder the secondaries open at all with a nominal 1200cfm carburation on a small block.

The plaugs are rather white than black, because of the general lean jetting of Edelbrock carbs.

I think you can't go wrong with dual 600cfm vacuum secondary carbs on a 428.

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/4...edual4s8eu.jpg

http://img484.imageshack.us/img484/9984/dscf01232vu.jpg

-Simon

flipper35 11-14-2006 10:48 AM

Add a little weight on the conter weights on the flapper valves (drill and peen some lead in) to help with them opening too soon.

Naumoff 11-14-2006 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFM5S159
Guys,
Does anyone have a suggestion regarding the use of an original BJ-BK 600 CFM dual quad setup for a good, practical driver? I drive a '67 GT500 soon to have a mild 428 w/Edelbrock heads. The stock dual quad set-up is too much carburation for the motor. How can I avoid dumping too much fuel into the motor and causing a rich condition and premature wear etc.?
I guess I could re-jet the carbs?
Any ideas would be welcome.
MC

They came with two fours stock. Why do you think they are two much?

SFM5S159 11-14-2006 01:30 PM

They did come stock, you are correct, but when I run a calculation the numbers seem to show a smaller amount of carb required.
I.E. 428 x 6000 (rpm) / 3456 = 743 CFM, even if I go to 6500 RPM, we get 800 CFM or so.
The dual quad set-up is cool to look at and talk about, but I think that a well thought out single four would perform better.
In my case for the sake of originality I need to maintain the dual qual set-up.
Mike C.

Naumoff 11-14-2006 04:30 PM

Just put the two fours back on. When I was in High School my daily driver had two 600 Holleys vacuum secondaries on a lowriser 427 with an automatic. No problems.
I have the same set up on my 427 Medium riser. No problems.

It will run fine. They are vacuum secondaries and they don't open unless the engine needs it. Good luck

Carnut427 11-14-2006 11:02 PM

SFM5S159, first of all, I'm not sure what size the Bj/BK carbs are, but I believe they're a bit smaller than 600 cfm; could be wrong, but 535 cfm comes to mind. Doesn't matter, vacuum secondaries only open when the engine can use the extra fuel/air, and only open as much as the engine can use; so even if they're rated at 600 cfm, they won't supply that much cfm on your engine. Run those puppies!

Dan

Dan Case 11-15-2006 02:14 PM

Mike,
I just sent a PM. These systems can be adjusted to be very smooth.

Dan

clayfoushee 11-15-2006 03:20 PM

Listen to Naumoff. He's been running stock FEs since he was a baby. I think of him as the "FE-Whisperer." When he talks to them, they always seem to behave.:)

1blackbb66 11-26-2006 01:19 AM

Mike,
Your forgetting the efficiency factor in your calculation. Most engines run 80 to 85%, with real good intake, cam profiles, heads and headers you can reach 90 to 95% but thats about it untill you go to forced induction.
Your 743 CFM X .90 = 669 CFM. 743 CFM X .95 = 706 CFM
Go to www.csgnetwork.com and plug in the numbers. It does the calculation for you. Two 500 CFM Edelbrock's, progressive linkage, lots of power with no flat spots.

Ray

LMH 11-26-2006 06:39 AM

http://www.csgnetwork.com/cfmcalc.html
Thanks Ray, I needed it too!
Larry

Excaliber 11-26-2006 08:23 AM

Dual fours on my 427, work good.

As for 'reading plugs' bear in mind a Multiple Spark Discharge type system (typical MSD) tends to make the plugs run a lighter color (even white) regardless of other factors (like a rich mixture). So it can be a bit misleading.

flipper35 11-27-2006 05:21 PM

Also, high end motors can and do achieve better than 100% VE. From the old cross rams to modern engines. As a matter of fact, Hughes Engines has a couple dyno tests on street engines on thier web site with better than 100% VE.

KevinM 11-28-2006 11:33 AM

That "Calculator" is missing some things. A dual plane manifold needs a larger CFM carb than a single plane on the same engine, because only half of the carb can be drawn through by any one cylinder. Whoever wrote that calculator program seems to be unaware of that.

I wouldn't trust it.

Kevin


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: