Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   Small Block Talk (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/small-block-talk/)
-   -   Roush Engine Warranty Exclusions. (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/small-block-talk/117848-roush-engine-warranty-exclusions.html)

blykins 11-03-2012 02:13 PM

Chas,

It depends on the journal size.

Most of the bearing manufacturers tell you to be at about .001"/inch of journal, and you add a half thou for the "hipo" stuff.

My SBC rod journals are usually at around .0020-.0025". BBC journals are the same.

Cleveland, SVO, and FE main journals are around .0027-.003".

My BBF and Windsor stuff is around .003" on the mains. If it's a few tenths each direction, I don't sweat it.

Cup engines run really tight clearances (they are pretty small journal though) and you know what kind of rpms they pull.

There has always been a tendency to start opening up the clearances when "race" is written in front of "engine", but I've never really seen the need.

ERA Chas 11-03-2012 02:24 PM

Brent,
Thanks for clarifying for the members . The Windsors, SBC and BBC's were right on your numbers at World.
Agreed about the 'race' myth.
Hope Clayton chimes in too.
Now who's torn down a new Roush and mic'd rods and mains??

Sawdust 11-03-2012 03:30 PM

My 402 goes through a quart of oil in about 2k.

blykins 11-03-2012 04:52 PM

I have a feeling they use really low tension rings....9-10 lbs.

RET_COP 11-03-2012 05:33 PM

Maybe a forged aluminum piston with more piston to wall, different from hyperutectic. I'm not getting it either Brent. We did run our drag engines a little on the loose side in the 80s. a little.

Mother 11-03-2012 05:53 PM

high oil consumption, out of spec valve guides, cracked pistons, rebuild costs, ya sure! I like spending money on parts that fail. I must call Rousch on the next busines day to order me one of those aaaaaa, what was it now?

csx4910 11-03-2012 07:20 PM

Don't even get me started on the laundry list of failures with those of us that got the first 511's. at least 5of us in Arizona got the first batch of those motors. And I think everyone has had catastrophic failures if not total rebuilds in the first 1-5k miles
Ron

ERA Chas 11-03-2012 07:28 PM

Yeah but you can get polished intakes, chromed coils, efi and black and chrome valve covers and big-ass air cleaners that say 'ROUSH' in big letters on 'em.
Takes a lot of design engineering to make that stuff. So's everybody in the parking lot can get wowed by that. That's what counts-they can see you wrote the big check.
Clearances? Ring tensions? Valve guides? Spare qt of Royal Purple in the trunk?; not to worry. You'll make it home. :MECOOL:

jwd 11-03-2012 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Parker (Post 1217663)
Above average oil consumption is more of an inconvenience than an out an out reliability or mechanical problem.

B.S. Oil usage is a sign that something is not right. There are many that have the same Roush motors and some use no oil and some are oil drinkers. The ones that are drinkers definitely have something wrong with them. The excuses Roush posted for new engine owners are nothing more than a way to get out of the liability for building junk. Personally, I would be embarrassed to have their valve covers on an engine.

csx4910 11-03-2012 07:56 PM

I hate to spoil your impression but I could of cared less whose name was on the valve cover, I didn't know about Keith craft or kirkham at the time and I simply wanted the most horsepower I could fit under the good.

If I had to do it over I would do a kirkham but why is it everyone craps on the CSX owners about writing a check for their car but not the guys writing bigger checks for their alloy kirkhams or the $175k I am sure the super snake kirkham with twin superchargers cost?

WildBill1965 11-03-2012 09:24 PM

Ok, I guess I'm one of the lucky ones only used one qt in and maybe 1/2 at the track in 17000+ miles and that was when the intake gasket went south! Not happy with the scorpion roller rockers, and by the way no cracks in them. Car has been tracked a little and not afraid of the loud pedal! Will probably blow up now! LOL

B i l l

olddog 11-04-2012 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RET_COP (Post 1217712)
Maybe a forged aluminum piston with more piston to wall, different from hyperutectic. I'm not getting it either Brent. We did run our drag engines a little on the loose side in the 80s. a little.

Bingo!

When stating your engine uses more oil than a modern day factory car and saying you have looser tolerances, your not talking about bearing clearances. Bearings have nothing to do with oil consumption. Of course they are talking about piston clearances.

Everybody fits forged pistons with more clearance than a hyperutectic piston, because if they don't the piston will swell up (thermal expansion), stick to the cylinder wall, and jerk the top off of the piston.

Someone mentioned their cylinder walls were badly worn. It's possible that there wasn't enough clearance.

To put this warranty into perspective, my 1966 Comet Cyclone GT with 390 Hi Po (a whopping 335 Hp) said in the manual that 1 quart in 500 miles was not to be considered excessive for the 390 Hi Po engine. It used 1 quart in 1000 miles.

My 1992 Crown Vic 4.6 ltr used 2 quarts in 3000 miles early on. Ford dealer showed me in writing that it had to use 1 quart in 1000 mile or more before they would consider it defective and do anything about it. At 155K mile it was burning a quart in 500 miles.

I do not see the warranty that Roush is putting out as way out of line. However all the problems I see people on here reporting scars me away.

CHANMADD 11-04-2012 08:36 AM

Manufacturers always Ok high oil consumption as normal because they don't want to face recall.
I would bet that most of you with high oil consumtion do not run PCV, s ....I am really confused as to how a " new " motor can have worn out valve stems , cylinder walls etc, etc. Are these manufacturers using used parts to start with...?... Someone send me your motor to rebuild......

akfish 11-04-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got the Bug (Post 1217672)
I've heard about issues with the 427 motor. Any reports from 402 owners? I know I'm going to jinx myself, but my 402 uses little to no oil. I change it annually and can't remember the last time I topped it off.


same here...13k...uses very little oil...maybe 1/2 quart in between oil changes.

Don 11-04-2012 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1217583)
I don't understand the need for loose clearances. It's unnecessary.

Curiosity, the NASCAR motors that turn up to 9,100/9,300 RPM, loose or tight clearances? With the expectation that in the Sprint series the motor only needs to last for one race, probably a full season or less in the Modified series.

JWilly 11-04-2012 05:59 PM

[b]Got the Bug[b]- My 402R is reliable, does not overheat, sounds great, crazy fast, gets 15+ mpg and burns no oil.

twobjshelbys 11-04-2012 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roush #1 (Post 1217654)
Tony,
I have heard very limited positive comments about after market fuel injection systems - Roush included.
No foot box heat issues in Lone Stars! =-)

Maybe, but I'm talking about the Roush 427IR. I'm just saying good luck at high altitudes with their incomplete setup. They even had the gall to ask for my "program" after I got it working.

Roush #1 11-04-2012 07:31 PM

Tony,
Let's try this again,
I don't know anyone who is pleased with the Roush injected engines, and very few who are pleased with any aftermarket fuel injection systems used on the street.
J

fordracing65 11-04-2012 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roush #1 (Post 1217826)
Tony,
Let's try this again,
I don't know anyone who is pleased with the Roush injected engines, and very few who are pleased with any aftermarket fuel injection systems used on the street.
J

I know plenty of guys who use Fast efi or Big stuff 3 programs that would never touch a carb again for street use, it seems even the bad efi setups are better than the best carbs for street...

blykins 11-05-2012 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don (Post 1217784)
Curiosity, the NASCAR motors that turn up to 9,100/9,300 RPM, loose or tight clearances? With the expectation that in the Sprint series the motor only needs to last for one race, probably a full season or less in the Modified series.

Tight. Under .002".

Loose clearances are a thing of the past. In the 60's/70's everyone kept opening the clearances up. It's not necessary and many SAE studies have shown that excessive clearance can cause oil to cavitate.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: