View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2009, 05:41 AM
jolsen42's Avatar
jolsen42 jolsen42 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mooresville, NC
Cobra Make, Engine: Factory Five chassis/Mr. Bruce slabside
Posts: 603
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron61 View Post
Ernie,

Just guessing but my guess would be there is a lot of money involved and they may lose a lot of it if the actual facts were ever made public. It seems everything any more winds up with money being the reason behind it.

Ron
Bingo! Any dissenting opinions are swept away. So much for peer review.
The science must stand on its own.

In science the burden of proof is on the theory.

The theory must provide the proof.

If the theory makes a prediction, which it must to not simply be a hypothesis, and the prediction is wrong then the theory is discarded.

That is part of the scientific method.

The AGW theory predicts that CO2 causes global warming.

CO2 is higher now then it was in 1998.

Average global temperature has been declining since 1998

The prediction made by the theory is wrong therefore the theory must be discarded.

It is called the scientific method. It only takes one wrong result to discard a theory.

Since the oceans are cooler AND the air is cooler AND there is more ice at the poles, where did the heat go?

It escaped through the CO2 and into space, since C02 can not block heat.

C02 does not block the movement of energy.

'No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.' Albert Einstein

John O
__________________
jjo42
Reply With Quote