View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2009, 01:24 PM
Cobrabill's Avatar
Cobrabill Cobrabill is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tucson, Az
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance 427 Side-Oiler
Posts: 2,156
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyCobra View Post
Ah, well this article is not entirely true. My son-in-law is a lawyer in Indy and I happen to know Judge Young myself. There is an up-charge for challenging a ticket and losing, but not as much as quoted in the article. It is set to cover the additional court costs. They charge it because the city refuses to fund the court system and Judge Young is trying to clear out the backlog of cases. Think of it as a "pay-as-you go" plan. You use it, you pay for it. I'm not saying I agree with it, but there is some common sense basis behind it.

Now personally, I wouldn't even have a clue about what the upcharge is. I've never had to pay it.
This flys in theface one one of the basic tenents the legal system is founded on.
__________________
The rest of the world can have their opinion about the United States just as soon as WE give it to them.

Last edited by Cobrabill; 12-14-2009 at 03:08 PM..
Reply With Quote