Not Ranked
Well it goes against our very nature, to "look people in the eye", so I think it's a long shot we would incorporate that technique.
I think a more reasonable approach is to take a hard look at the first list of 500,000 people. WHO are these folks? You can bet a good 50% of them don't need to be there. With a smaller list we could more effectively target the real threats. The problem is figuring out who the "50%" are that should not be on the list! Well, then get to work on that, figure it out.
|