Not Ranked
I think it's the same standard of "proof" that applies to virtually everyone in the USA. Politicians and Presidents alike. A "certified copy" is acceptable under the law. There is only one original. To make it available to various groups put's the document at risk.
And to WHICH group or person should the document BE made available to? Rush maybe? Politano? ABC political commentator? Perhaps a Republican of good standing? Would this person receiving said document be sufficiently schooled in forgeries to determine the original from a certified copy without markings? A fraudulent copy? Would we be able to trust their word over, I don't know, the CIA, FBI or who ever else has all ready been down this road? Would a Judge be able to tell one document from another? If not, who would the special investigators be to make that determination and report back to the Judge?
In other words, you either believe the document exists or you don't. There is no way to "prove it" satisfactorily to everyone. There will ALWAYS be doubt and the conspiracy theorists just because of who Obama is.
|