This is an incomplete article full of omissions and guesses - it even says so. I find it amusing that that's enough for the usual suspects to fly off the handle and start criticizing a situation very likely to be nothing like what's described, in actions or underlying reasons and policies.
Funny how when "the media" reports something you don't like, they're "distorting things" and "inventing problems"... but when a half-assed, incomplete story pokes your button, you take it as gospel and are ready to ride out, guns blazing.
