[Nedsel]

The problem with the 2 COX 6036 cars out there is that things don't happen in a vacuum, nor does one event happen all by itself. In the case of this car, there was a serious engine fire which destroyed a good bit of the car. No one could tell for certain how the heat had affected the metallurgy of the chassis, and it was Autokraft which suggested that the car be reconstructed with a new chassis and body. So that is what the owner chose to do. He legally transferred ownership of the VIN - which was his alone - to the new vehicle, which was OK by British law, especially as the new car was constructed by what was then the official AC Factory. At that point in time, the burnt chassis became "parts" and nothing more - even if a VIN could still be discerned on the chassis. COX 6036 is legally the new car today, and the remains of the original car -according to DMV code - is legally something else. Anyone can try to claim the "original car" should be called the correct COX 6036, but to do so ignores the rightful ownership of the VIN, which was legally transferred to the NEW car by its LEGAL owner. This is far from a one-sided interpretation of the situation; this is a simple conclusion based on ALL of the facts rather than the few that some people like to use to support a different position.