View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2012, 03:41 AM
Dominik's Avatar
Dominik Dominik is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cape Town, South Africa/Mainz, Germany,
Posts: 1,601
Not Ranked     
Default

I agree on various numbers for losses due to poor exhaust design, but one shouldn't add 80 - 100Hp as a default to rwHp just to make it sound good at the next bench racing session.

And I don't agree on the 20% losses for the drivetrain. Your transmission engineers would kill you for that bad percentage. Also, nobody rated a Nascar 750Hp 358cui at 1.000Hp just because the valve train and friction took away 250Hp at max rpm.

Fact is, the 427 has a very bad drag coefficient. We tested it in 1995 with GM's (OPEL) engineering team on the German A5 Frankfurt-Darmstadt (no speed limit).

+/- 570Hp (DIN) to get to 198mph in the late 60s? Very much achievable by Dick Smith's engine builder. What windshield did he use??

But we will never change this SAE/DIN debate :-)
__________________
If I don't respond anymore, that's because I can't log in
Reply With Quote