Not Ranked
I agree on various numbers for losses due to poor exhaust design, but one shouldn't add 80 - 100Hp as a default to rwHp just to make it sound good at the next bench racing session.
And I don't agree on the 20% losses for the drivetrain. Your transmission engineers would kill you for that bad percentage. Also, nobody rated a Nascar 750Hp 358cui at 1.000Hp just because the valve train and friction took away 250Hp at max rpm.
Fact is, the 427 has a very bad drag coefficient. We tested it in 1995 with GM's (OPEL) engineering team on the German A5 Frankfurt-Darmstadt (no speed limit).
+/- 570Hp (DIN) to get to 198mph in the late 60s? Very much achievable by Dick Smith's engine builder. What windshield did he use??
But we will never change this SAE/DIN debate :-)
__________________
If I don't respond anymore, that's because I can't log in
|