Thread: Rarest Cobra
View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2012, 07:56 AM
YerDugliness's Avatar
YerDugliness YerDugliness is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: No city...only 118 residents in Manter, KS
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobra Auto Works body, Ron Godell Racecars chassis, 1989 Mustang GT 5.0 HO (converted to carb), W/C T-5, 3.73's in a Ford 9" Traction-Loc.
Posts: 812
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SunDude View Post
Like Thor said, ALL of the Cobra chassis were produced by AC Cars, including the Daytona Coupes.
Thanks...I wasn't positive about the Daytonas, thought they were a styling exercise managed by Pete Brock here in the U.S. including the stretched chassis. I can see that the chassis being original, i.e. having been produced in GB by AC cars, would include them in the population specified by Thor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SunDude View Post
The Sebring roadsters (CSX2127-2129) were campaigned by the Shelby American team. Surely you recognize this photo of Carroll with the cars.
Absolutely...that's a photo I'm sure we've all seen many times, one of the iconic images of ol' Shel!

So...the Sebring roadsters...they don't look like slab-sides, so would they be FIA models or USRRC models? IMHO, they would not be a separate model unto themselves unless they had different chassis or body configurations. Where would they fit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SunDude View Post
The "Slalom Snake" package consisted of special wheel-tire-suspension-brake components suited for autocross and high-speed driving. CSX2537 is on display at the Shelby American Collection in Colorado.
I guess the "Slalom Snake" package would be similar to the Sebring roadsters...must have been some sort of modification to one of the factory iterations...either the FIA model or the USRRC model. Where would they fit, given that my understanding (once again, perhaps flawed) is that they were merely styling/equipment "options" on an already existing model.

Not sure why this issue is so important to me, I've never been much of an originality nut, but I find myself, as I plan future upgrades on my Cobra replica, looking more and more at the Originality forum and planning the upgrades so that the end result will be a more original looking replica. My car just won "Club Choice" at the 1st Annual SHSU Auto Club Car Show, but when I had the "placard" that was placed on the car as it was shown completed, I made sure it said "1966 Shelby Cobra REPLICA"...but, having said that, IMHO there is no shame in attempting to make it appear to be a more accurate replica. I really liked what Dean Lampe did with his recent Hurricane build...even went to the trouble of installing dummy wiring in the engine compartment so that it would more accurately replicate one of CS's originals...that may be a bit "extreme" for me, but I like the intent!

One more question for the originality buffs here....what were the differences between the FIA and the USRRC models? I understand the FIA models had to have "bumps" in the rear "bonnet" to accommodate the FIA required luggage. What kind of wheel flare, roll bar, etc differences would cause them to be "replicated" by our replica manufacturers as FIA vs. USRRC? For example, Unique markets an FIA replica, and I think ERA markets theirs as a USRRC replica...

Thanks, guys!

Cheers!

Dugly
__________________
YD,E./PNB

No names were changed to protect the innocent!

Last edited by YerDugliness; 09-28-2012 at 12:15 PM.. Reason: spelling....again....and again....it's ALWAYS spelling for some reason :-(
Reply With Quote