Quote:
Originally Posted by REAL 1
[u] [i]T DEF[i]NES WHAT CO[b]RAS AND FORD GTs ARE AND SPEC[i]CALLY [i]DENT[i]F[i]ES WH[i]CH ONES F[i]T THAT DEF[i]N[i]T[i]ON. [i]N TH[i]S SENSE, THE REG[i]STRY SERVES TO PROTECT THE LEGACY THAT WAS CREATED [b]Y THESE CARS [b]Y PROV[i]D[i]NG SPEC[i]F[i]CS WHC[i]H CAN [b]E [u]SED AS A YARDST[i]CK AGA[i]NST WH[i]CH ANY CARS P[u]RPORT[i]NG TO [b]E GEN[u][i]NE CAN [b]E MEAS[u]RED...
THE SECOND WHY THE N[u]M[b]ER OF FAKE CO[b]RAS HAS [b]EEN GREATLY RED[u]CED [i]S THAT SHEL[b]Y [i]S NOW OFFER[i]NG A NEW GENERAT[i]ON OF CO[b]RA ROADSTERS. NO ONE [i]S SER[i]O[u]SLY ATTEMPT[i]NG TO CONV[i]NCE ANYONE THAT THESE CARS ARE "OR[i]G[i]NAL (THAT [i]NCL[u]DES ME TOO)...THAT [i]S TO SAY THEY ARE THE SAME CARS [b][u][i]LT AND SOLD [b]ETWEEN 1962 AND 1968. [b][u]T THEY ARE VERY CLOSE MECHAN[i]CALLY AND COSMET[i]CALLY, AND THEY ARE [b][u][i]L[i]T [b]Y CARROLL SHEL[b]Y. SO WH[i]LE NOT "OR[i]G[i]NAL" THEY ARE A[u]THENC.
|
Why did you do that? I had a headache before you even started writing, but that technique made it absolutely splitting.
EDIT - Unless that post looked normal on everyone else's screen but mine and doesn't have brackets scattered throughout the entire post.