Quote:
Originally Posted by blykins
I don't think I know of anyone that would use that large of a hydraulic roller in that size of an engine. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, my 482 FE's, with almost 60 cubes more displacement, only need 248 @ .050" to peak the horsepower at around 6000.
|
What about a large solid roller. Speaking in terms of performance only, not maintenance, reliability, or liability when Joe Average breaks it and bashes the builder all over the net.