Thread: Misconceptions
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2015, 08:05 PM
REAL 1's Avatar
REAL 1 REAL 1 is offline
Banned
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Jersey, N.J
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby Cobra CSX4206 aluminum body, original 1965 NASCAR 427 SO, Dual quads.
Posts: 3,897
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe's Garage View Post
Stay with the Walsh Ruling, you're almost there.
It's as simple as your A, B and C's ...

A. Shelby Continuation
B. ERA, SPF, BDR, FFR, EM, Kirkham, Contemporay, Unique etc.
C. Kit Car Replica of the 1960's Shelby Cobra

Per Judge Walsh A=C
Also per Judge Walsh B=C
Therefore A=B, are we good?
See post #151 and you should clearly have my answer on this "replica" issue you are hung up on. You keep using the term "ruling". Walsh's ruling had nothing do with the issue of whether one vehicle was a "replica" or not a "replica" but if it makes you happy feel free to read it that way. I'll let someone else explain the difference between a ruling and dicta.

You didn't answer my question. Since you seem to accept "rulings" of Federal decisions as dispositive answer the question.

Almost there.
__________________
U.S. Army Rangers. Leading travel agents to Allah.