Quote:
Originally Posted by REAL 1
Gee then SAAC should immediately correct the Registry and their statement on their Web site as "per Ned". Still reads consistently 7 years later. 
In the meantime, I'll go with the current SAAC statement on their website and the Registry.
You can go with Ned.
P.S. A "replica" can be genuine. Sure it can. Read the Registry. |
I didn't know SAAC publishes a Registry every week, month or even every year? You do realize that publishing the Registry is a monumental task done by volunteers. They publish roughly every decade, if I remember correctly.
Anyway, definitions can change over time. New words are created all the time. The dictionary and Wiki change constantly.
But one thing is for sure. A replica cannot be genuine. That is pure unadulterated logic. And I'll stick with logic.