View Single Post
  #189 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2016, 01:25 PM
peterpjb's Avatar
peterpjb peterpjb is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 498
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark IV View Post
If you place value on the Shelby name and the car being a "50TH Anniversary" model then the price is justified. There is price difference from ERA to Superformance to Shelby based upon the level of replication of the original 289 car, i.e. transverse leafs vs. coil overs, etc. Every buyer will place a different value on what they want and perceive as being "correct"

There is no wrong choice, the best car is the one you want and can buy.
i wonder what an era-dealer would say

....but joking apart:

at the moment there are 4 different types of rebuildings for sale:

era: 65'
spf: 90'
csx: 190' (50th; glass)
csx: 280' (50th; alu)... that would be my preferred choice..

for me the most relevant aspect of originality would be the aluminium-body

and isn't it subordinate if there is a leaf spring or a coil spring when you have a plastic body ?
so i think for me would be the choice: era or csx alu, that is a difference,
(especially in the price..)

...but at the end its all no csx 2000

so why not the era?
Reply With Quote