Quote:
Originally Posted by MHNCO
SPF cars are nearly identical to originals. CAVs are not. Hence the disparity in value and resale.
|
"Nearly identical"? Puh-leeze. Nonsense.
A car made in 2016 is simply not the same car that was built 50 years ago. Different materials, different company, different tools. SPF use to claim 90% parts "interchangeability", but were called on that BS. And now they claim 70% parts "interchangeability."
I will agree that the CAV's appearance isn't close and they don't have 'continuation" status, so the SPF's have far superior resale value, but then CAV's aren't $110,000-$115,000 rollers either.