View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2022, 08:29 AM
cycleguy55's Avatar
cycleguy55 cycleguy55 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: White City, SK
Cobra Make, Engine: West Coast, 460 CID
Posts: 2,852
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CompFi View Post
Appreciate the feedback on your preferred tire sizes.

So far, unanimous agreement that the 295/50s are the way to go for the rear.

Up front, preferences for both the 225/65s and the 245/60s.

Can anyone explain the pros and cons here?

Again, many thanks!
SascoSports lists both as 26.7" tall. http://www.sascosports.com/tires_sea...im_diameter=15

Both have essentially identical heights / diameters, so that's a wash. Section and tread width for the 245/60R15 are wider by 0.8" than the 225/65R15, so that's a consideration if clearances are limited.

Worth noting is the 'Approved' rim width for 225/65R15 is 6.5"-8.0", with the 'standard' width being 7.0". For 245/60R15, the 'Approved' rim width is 7.5"-9.0", with a 'standard' rim width of 8.5". If you're running 7" wide wheels you're therefore limited to running 225/65R15. Conversely, if your wheels are 8.5" wide, then you'd need the wider tires.

The extra tread width on the 245/60R15 tires will increase turning effort at low speeds - which may be a consideration if you're not running power steering. The extra width should also increase grip at the front end which will affect your handling. If your car is already neutral in its handling, then wider tires could result in oversteer. If you're experiencing understeer, then wider tires will help to reduce that. IMO, for a car running 295/50R15 on the rear, 245/60R15 seems like a better match than does 225/65R15.
__________________
Brian
Reply With Quote