View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2022, 06:58 AM
spdbrake spdbrake is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,442
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roylerumble View Post
Hey all, still getting everything to start my build, tore the engine down, getting ready to rebuild it. Its a 302/5.0 from a 91 mustang. I'm trying to figure out the water pump, timing cover, rad, and accessories bracketry.

So, am I to understand that the CRII uses a passenger side lower rad hose because a rad with a drivers side lower rad hose would cause clearance issues with the steering rack? The rad mine came with is passenger side, so, my plan was to use a standard rotation (clockwise) water pump with passenger side outlet and a early model timing chain cover with the pointer cast into the drivers side, and an aftermarket 3/4 hole damper with timing marks on both sides. I'm also looking at this setup from CVF:
https://www.cvfracing.com/ford-289-3...ternator-only/
but wonder alternator clearance is an issue with these cars. If it is they also make this model:
https://www.cvfracing.com/ford-289-3...th-water-pump/
but I don't see an option for passenger side lower rad hose

Lastly, there's also alternator and power steering kits that use the Saginaw or Ford components:
https://www.cvfracing.com/ford-289-3...ower-steering/
Would this work if I had a Mustang II power rack?

My front end components are all Heights UCA and LCA, GM 1 piston calipers.

I used a March Performance bracket which is a bit lower than the CVF.
https://marchperformance.com/ford/fo...t-30025-c.html

To tuck the Alt even lower I switched to a 92-96 Ford Van or F250 alternator. Top mount for the tensioner is at 45 angle. Connections are down low in the alt as well.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
It does require a much shorter turnbuckle body, its a hair shorter than the valve cover height now.




VS what I took off https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Reply With Quote