[Jack21]

Vince,

My regret is not installing the 393 stroker kit before installing the engine in the car. Have no regrets installing retrofit hydraulic roller cam.

If I had to choose between a flat tappet hydraulic cam and 393 stroker kit, or retrofit hydraulic roller cam and stock displacement; I'd take the 393 stroker kit and flat tappet hydraulic cam hands down!

Of course, if I could have the hydraulic roller, AND the 393
stroker, that would be my ultimate choice.

If I were building an engine with the idea of upgrading as funds became available, I'd do the 393, and have the machine work to install the roller cam later done to the lifter valley. Then, it's a simple cam upgrade.

Be sure to use the right heads on the motor that will accomodate your upgrades. A 393 will need the 2.08/1.60 valves so you don't want to do this twice. Lots to choose from; TFS, AR, etc.