[TerrysSPF]

Turk: First, let me say that I own a BMW. Yes, I comapred what BMW offered in their 5 series (I have a 540I Sport) to what Audi's 6 had, the Jag S-type, Lexus GS430, Merc. E430, etc..... But when all else failed (they were ALL nice cars with similar features), I DROVE them. The Bimmer won.

I'm sure people will compare Cobra's by driving them as well (as they should!). I'm simply saying that for those of us who think 10K is a good chunk of change (or, maybe someone would rather take that 10K and put it toward the engine vs. the chassis), I think the CSX cars compare more to the ERA's in price than to the SPF's. Sure, ERA's are great cars; I've seen several and think they are at the top of the class (and I've said this before). I've always liked them because (IMO) they have the "correct look" and stance of the orig. cars. Well, now there is another "correct looking" car out there in the same price range. That won't effect ERA's sales (especially when you add in the ERA waiting time)?? Maybe, maybe not. Only time will tell.
I'm just saying that the new CSX cars are closer in price to the ERA than they are to the SPF (after adding all the "extra's that are on the Shelby options list).
You may not know anyone who purchased their ERA over a SPF because of price.........but I can name quite a few people who bought a SPF over an ERA just for that reason. If someone has the money to buy an ERA (roller vs roller.......not unpainted, no wheels, etc......) then, sure, I would probably buy the ERA. But I was at a lot more than 40K when I added it up.