[Ogwasnowski]

ColoradoCobras - In all fairness, how can KMC be expected to be responsible for the irresponsibility of the former owners of the tooling it now possesses? This doesn't seem right. I know if I purchased the tooling from a defunct co., I sure wouldn't want that company's former customers coming to me expecting me to make good on obligations made by a party totally unrelated to me. Don't get me wrong, I'd be happy to help them out, but it would cost them. After all, companies (especially new companies) can't be giving stuff away for free and expect to survive. Am I missing something here?

Derek