Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
04-13-2007, 10:39 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cape Town, South Africa/Mainz, Germany,
Posts: 1,601
|
|
Not Ranked
557 doesn't rev
good morning,
We stroked a FORD Motorsport 514 to 557. Kept the cam and timing, went to 12:1 CR and ran out of revs (only 5500 instead of 6500).
Do we have to retard the cam more (amongst other possibilities)?
We use a 1050cfm carb.
6200 RPM would be perfect with the current diff ratio.
Dominik
www.capetownskies.com
__________________
If I don't respond anymore, that's because I can't log in
|
04-14-2007, 04:47 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,391
|
|
Not Ranked
You can retard the cam timing, but frankly, you're out of cam and possibly head flow.
When you increase the displacement of an engine, it takes more cam to fill the cylinders in the allotted time. You have to have head flow to back that up.
Also, I don't know the particular strokes for a 385 series engine, but increasing the stroke could also damper the hp peak a little due to the fact that you're swinging more weight.
Retarding the cam timing may move it up about 500 rpm or so...but it's not the correct solution.
For a peak hp of 6500 in a 557ci engine, you're gonna need LOTS of duration.
|
04-14-2007, 05:11 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cape Town, South Africa/Mainz, Germany,
Posts: 1,601
|
|
Not Ranked
thanks!
I check the "basics" soon, like fuel and air supply, monitor A/F ratio, power and torque peak on the chassis dyno.
we are quite happy with all the torque and power the engine makes up to 5500 and I forward your advise about head flow and cam to the driver/owner.
he will be happy to put another diff in and leave the cam as it is.
this is a "low performance" country and this car is the fastest, by far!
Dominik, Cape Town
__________________
If I don't respond anymore, that's because I can't log in
|
04-14-2007, 05:22 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,391
|
|
Not Ranked
Good luck with it! How much hp/torque did it make?
|
04-14-2007, 09:25 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta,
GA
Cobra Make, Engine: CAV GT40 with 331 KC
Posts: 2,187
|
|
Not Ranked
With a 557 you really shouldn't need anything much above an idle, surely?
|
04-15-2007, 09:59 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cape Town, South Africa/Mainz, Germany,
Posts: 1,601
|
|
Not Ranked
Good day,
we got about 900Nm (660lbft) and 605 hp as a 514cui and 1000Nm (740lbft) as a 557, with not too much more hp. I have to check, but if I remember correctly 625hp.
I don't have the dyno sheets here, so I can't recall the corresponding RPM.
Impressive numbers, no matter how you look at it and what the error may be.
The car did easily low 10s (sorry, this is not a Cobra, rather a FORD Fiesta) and we think about adding a wing now for better high-speed traction.
The track is actually too short for braking, the driver lifts off at about 350 yards.
I don't want to know what happens with that engine in my Cobra...
Yes, I agree: 5500rpm is enough!
Dominik
__________________
If I don't respond anymore, that's because I can't log in
|
04-16-2007, 06:42 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 92
|
|
Not Ranked
|
04-16-2007, 09:49 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cape Town, South Africa/Mainz, Germany,
Posts: 1,601
|
|
Not Ranked
very cool!
__________________
If I don't respond anymore, that's because I can't log in
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|