I posted a copy of the bill in the lounge this morning asking for peoples interpetations on parts of it. I think this is the same bill that Flores tried a year or so ago and got so much heat he withdrew it, and now that his buddy Davis is gone he is getting others to try and get it through. There are some really undefined areas in the bill that I think leaves to much up to whoever the state decides to have interpet the bill. The whole thing should be done away with as should assembly woman Lieber. If interpeted one way, it will completely void any cars registered under SB-100. Example, you register your car as a 1965 Cobra replica, but the registration is 2004. The car can still be a 1965 replica but could be made to meet the emission requirements of the year it is registered and not thet year of the car body or motor. This is the way it was explained to me by a friend of mine in Sacramento who is fighting against it. I am not sure if this is correct and think all people from all states should look at this farce and decide what they think.
Ron
