[venom0427]

rebel1 you are right, but again,each state and each engineer has a way of looking at the ADRs, so were do you start.

do you get a body or group of engineers together and do battle.

remember, we lost 5 good engineers (vic only)due to d1ck heads at each RTA branchs.
they all lost to them.
but its not just the kit manufacturers responsibility to meet the requirments,
One engineer’s opinion is different to another or the guy behind the counter.
Each engineer was taught differently to the other, so the way that they look at a set of rules, will be the way that they interpret it.

That’s what I was saying about the twist and beam test(chassis), there is the QLD way or the VIC way or the WA way or even the NSW way.

They all do the test differently, all we have to do is submit the test with the paper work VIC, but then it’s up to the guy in QLD to decipher or accept or reject the engineers report, or re do the test to comply with his way (or his standards).
And also, the euro3-4 ADRs, that we have to or will be having to comply to, the USA has stronger regulations than that of Europe, thanks again to Anderson, his decision has changed the Australian way of the future.

Think, Ferrari, Bentley, Chevy low volume, ford low volume, etc, these cars will never be seen on the streets of Australia, because of these new rules.

The 2005 dodge viper was to sell in Australia for $306,000, and Chrysler decided to pull the pin, because of him????.........it was going to be to hard to comply