View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2007, 08:03 AM
patrickt's Avatar
patrickt patrickt is offline
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by priobe
One of the major problems that I am having here in miami is that most of the chassis Dyno are owned by kids with no expierence with Webers. As for the heads they have been worked on already. Larger valves and ported and polished have been addressed. This has also extend into the intake.
...

I have spent alot of money & time with these webers ( which I am sure most weber owners have) but I am still not seeing the benifits of the webers.
Virgin shortblock, ported, polished, matched, free flowing pipes ... sounds very, very nice. Again, I don't think the cam is your problem. To give you a rough benchmark, I run a stroked and bored 428 so the cubes are 447. I have a solid, flat tappet cam (245/525) that I would describe as mild. I do not have Webers; I have an old-style Holley 3310 (4160, with one metering block) -- a child could set it up. I put out 450HP using both mufflers and a water pump. Torque is just under 500 ft. lbs. I can't imagine your engine, with the Webers all in synch, not matching these numbers or beating them. Webers are absolutely gorgeous to look at -- no doubt about it. But they can be a nightmare to get, and keep, in synch. I don't know who the Weber experts are here on CC, but if that were my engine I would be inclined to fly them down for the day and pay them to teach me what I needed to know to get them set up right and to keep them that way. In view of what you've already got in that engine, that's a relatively cheap expense.
Reply With Quote