Y'know - part of the fun I have with arguing with people such as yourselves is in trying to guess when you will decide that sarcasm becomes a valid debate point.
CdC made some statements with no facts to back them up, and Jamo agreed with them. Both of you also assumed that I said something that I didn't. I call you on it, and then I offer up some evidence indicating that CdCs statements were wrong, and then suddenly you guys start acting like 4th graders.
This is how the drunk-on-kool-aid mighty GOP defends it policies? No wonder you have to vote for Hillary!
Jamo, you said:
"Nope. You're assuming "a majority of the people fighting us" constitutes a majority of the people in Iraq. Do you have some super secret statistics upon which to base such an assumption?"
before you changed your response to agree with CdC. The ISG report also mentions the same thing as General Dannatt, but I really don't feel like re-reading the thing to find it. Perhaps you should take a few minutes and skim through it (since you obviously have not) and then you can be in on the super secret statistics as well.
Steve