Quote:
Originally Posted by powerslide
Is there any oil in Tibet? That seems to be the litmus test for Dubbya and Dick. If the answer is "yes" we can probably bring the hydrocarbons out, over the Himalayas on the backs of yaks, on a cost effective basis, assuming $4.00 per gallon for gas. |
Naah. It's only a "litmus test" for liberals who seek to blame others for their incomptence, their lack of leadership, their facist-like power grab that has only resulted in even more exposure for them of being idiots, and their stupidity.
There's nothing more irrelevent, incompetent or immoral than a liberal ... except for a liberal who uses terms like 'Dubbya' or who believes that the only reason anyone should go after something is if
oil is involved.
If it were about
oil, we would be drilling deep in the U.S.; we've got far more in the way of oil reserves than the rest of world. If it were about oil, we would have long ago removed the EPA. If it were about oil, we would have invaded a certain south american country, rather than run off to the middle east.
It's so cute when a liberal tries to be relevant and pretend he knows what's going on in the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerslide
Somehow I think we've bitten off enough with Tibet's neighbors in Afghanistan,
|
Yeah ... that's why we hear about how we're losing in Afghanistan every night, and there's a running tally of the body count of American troops lost in Afghanistan on CNN every night, and ...
Oh, wait. There's not.
Somehow ... you're wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerslide
we don't need anymore "adventures" right now, especially when we are outnumbered, by a couple billion!
|
You have no idea what you're you're talking about. Go back out and hug a tree or hump a baby harp seal or drink a double decaf half caf nonfat whip frappawhippy cheesedog or whatever it is you liberals do.
Your pal,
Meat.