I'm getting tired...
The builder got an invoice showing that the engine had been in the car for 8 months before they were told of the problem. If you are accepting statements from each as if they are true...you (again) should take the time to read everything so you know what the facts (as we have been presented them) are. Thus...it cannot be "assumed" that the engine was not run during that period.
By waiting...the owner created that issue. It certainly was not something he decided to share with us during his first few posts on this site (a valid consideration given his communications to the builder), which further raises some crediblity issues which need to be addressed.
Again...we don't really know who's right or wrong here, but it is certainly not a slam dunk as our new member laid it out to be.
No offense cdnus, but you're not pleading the owner's case very well. It would be nice if he would post and provide some responses since he brought this thing to us in the first place, but that's for him to decide.
