cb the more you type .... I laugh, you think I am insane.
Have you ever studied logic... or the truth tables... if True then True?
"if there is proof of any affiliation with a militant group as described above, I will change my vote,"
I said "IF" you changed your vote THEN would mean that there was proof of affiliation with a militant group, THUS/THERBY the public would have nearly (as the CNN poles suggest) placed a tool in a most effective position.
I am truly amazed that despite your vehement worship of O... you have now cast some doubt on your vote.
Are you that naive to not know history? Never in the history of the world has there been a senator with their own agenda.
(Quintus Servilius Caepio Brutus, Stalin, Hitler, (don't ban me bro! just making a comparison of rising to power by a lack of scrutinizing public))
VRM...
I just posted the first article from google. No party affiliation was truly intended. My point was that this is nothing new... but, because you brought it up
.... for fun... about 2 to 1
no I don't think this is that accurate.
Searched "democrat voter fraud"
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,130,000 for democrat voter fraud. (0.08 seconds)
Searched "republican voter fraud"
Results 1 - 10 of about 509,000 for republican voter fraud. (0.07 seconds)