[VRM]

Originally Posted by J. T. Toad

OH PUH-LEEEZE,,, Americansright contends the suit will be dismissed.
He also hopes for a favourable opinion. I wonder what he means by that...
Oh PUH-LEEEEZE "spread the wealth" isn't Marxist?
Spread the wealth is Marxist, but Obama wants to give me back more of my tax money and charge more taxes for the wealthy. That is not Marxist, just biased. And the wealthy already had a big tax cut a few years ago. In fact, by 2010 the richest 1-2% will have had a tax cut of about 5-6%, whilst all the rest of us will only have had a tax cut of 1-3%. Why shouldn't I get a 5% cut as well?

OH PUH-LEEEZE how many lawyers do you know who work pro-bono? I guess the ACLU does, but they usually win awards or settle where there compensation is 250K plus.
OH PUHHHHHHHH_LEEEEEEZE what lawyer HASN'T taken advantage of any and all public exposure they could attain. Where were you during the OJ trial?

I have no problem with lawyers working for pay, nor with self-promotion. However, my suspicious nature makes me wonder if this lawyer suspected his case would be thrown out, but went ahead anyways simply for the money and exposure.

Would a comment like this;

"lotion up and go please yourself. "

get a thread locked down?

Thanks, I just might.
And since I am such a nice guy let me return the favour with something I strongly suspect you will derive a great deal of pleasure from, though it may be a bit difficult for you to do physically - go bugger yourself. (and those of us with that 'British heritage' understand the difference)

Steve