Quote:
Originally Posted by clayfoushee
Good, so the tax system is not the problem, and it is OK to "redistribute wealth" that way. I see . . .
So what is the earned income credit? And what is the current welfare system? What pays for those two things? Aren't those policies owned by elected officials from both parties?
And please show me where Sen. Obama has promised to "issue checks" to those who have earned no income. Didn't President Bush propose an economic stimulus package where lower income people got checks up to $750, and rich people did not?
|
The words came out of his mouth on TV. In one of the debates?
The Bush stimulus package was wrong too. Government trying to run business has always caused problems as bad as those they set out to cure.
The Bush stimulus however did not say, "We are going to take more from those that have and give it to those who have not." Philosophically, that's a better position than the Obamination, fiscally, it is just as bad. Bush IS as much Democrap as any declared Democrap.
Have you listened to this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
Obamaination's "Redistribution of Wealth" is NOT a new program for him. In 2001 he was FOR legislation to do that regarding the Civil Rights movement.
This after white America has paid TRILLIONS of dollars in reparations and damages to the black community. Since 1960, we have welfared, granted, funded, legislated, gifted and blown more money on the black community than all the punitive damage awards worldwide in all of history. Did whites treat black slaves horribly? Sure they did, even those slave owners that knew a healthy worker was a more productive worker, mistreated them by the idea of slavery. And others holding absolute power, were monsters. And we have been paying a liberal mandated, OPEN ENDED, damage award for nearly 50 years. Not just a damage award larger than all others added together, and one we don't even know if its even the FIRST INSTALLMENT.
But a damage award that has not helped the black community make any real progress. Some individuals have fought their way out, but I submit that was in spite of our help, not due to it.
We do not have a long history of BO but we do have a history. And history DOES tell us what a person WILL do in the future.
He WILL either agree with or be duped by radicals.
He will raise taxes
He will not reject self interests.
He will not cut spending.
He will be outrageously liberal.
All that is not what he says, he talks more Republican than Republicans do, but it is what he will do because that's all he knows. It has been his life to date.
Dan