Thread: 427so vs 482so
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2008, 05:59 PM
Anthony Anthony is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: cleveland, OH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX4000, 427
Posts: 1,999
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sparks View Post
Is there any advantage or disadvatage between the 2? Mild builds(not wild)

I have a 427 (actually 429 ci, 4.250 bore, 0.017" over) in my car, and it put 488 ft-lbs of torque at the rear wheels. A 477 ci in a similar car put 476 torque at the rear wheels. My friend who has a 482 hydraulic roller built by a respectable builder, on a different dyno, put 420 ft-lbs at the rear wheels. Yeah, for any given build, the extra cubes will give you more torque, but 427 ci will give enough as well.


If you get a used complete motor, you don't have to buy another crank. The engine will remain a "true" 427.

If you buy a stroker crank, 3.98, 4.25, etc. you get more cubes, but also you get BBC rod journals, that are slightly wider and shorter, which is better. You will also get more torque, although top end HP will be closer to the same.

No matter which way you go, you'll be fine, assuming you put it together correctly.
__________________
"After jumping into an early lead, Miles pitted for no reason. He let the entire field go by before re-entering the race. The crowd was jumping up and down as he stunned the Chevrolet drivers by easily passing the entire field to finish second behind MacDonald's other team Cobra. The Corvette people were completely demoralized."

Last edited by Anthony; 11-23-2008 at 05:39 AM..
Reply With Quote