View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 02:11 PM
patrickt's Avatar
patrickt patrickt is offline
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,025
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vettestr View Post
If your job is reading a mass spec report it would seem you would get good at it sooner or later.
Only if the data is accurate to begin with. Charles Navarro used to have a spreadsheet on his LN Engineering site that listed a hundred or so of the more common oils along with the Zinc, Phos, Boron, Moly, and detergent values. These values were derived from various oil labs, all of whom you would recognize. Several of the oil manufacturers complained (Brad Penn being one) that the numbers were just flat out wrong. As I recall, Charles did his best to either correct, or to at least annotate, their concerns. I further recall that Charles penned more than a few forum messages that addressed his frustration with the accuracy of oil labs. I believe he now offers that service himself. Suffice to say that I would not pull my bearings out based on one lab report that spotted some errant metal. But I might if based on two, especially if they were from different labs....
Reply With Quote