Steve,
just an example
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...02/ai_n9080735
C with a space B
We are not talking semantics. What you write IS the small piece of the puzzle, what I am saying is the SOCIETY has over spent with no regard as to the ramifications of such actions. If there is no money now, how is creating more money by trading future monies for unchecked spending now going to help?
Saying what I wrote is disingenuous or misinformation is ignorant, especially since you argue that we are in a semantic battle. (IOW semantic arguments have the same opinion but argue out the language, thus, saying the same thing... IOW look in the mirror) Are you saying that someone who defaults on a loan is pursuing an "affordable" option? Laughable. As cold as it might seem, for someone who follows socialists inclinations, a default on a loan means the payor couldn't afford it.