View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2009, 10:45 PM
RodKnock's Avatar
RodKnock RodKnock is offline
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNFER2 View Post
I'm sure that's true. They have a lot of time working combination on the dyno's. What works & descent.

Your specs. sounds like a good cam. Is it worth the price being a billet?
The HP is at a good level but the torque,....613 @ 4,600 rpm, now that's impressive. How lumpy is it ?

Can you post the dyno graph so I can see both curves ?

I assumed the new side oilers have addressed the oiling issue, has it not ?

Thanks,
I'll have to scan and post it later, but I'm sure most of the 482's are very similar. The lumpiness of my cam is similar to the lumpiness of a high-HP solid lifter Chevy BB. As I said previously, not too small and not too big. If you want to run Dynatek later, then stay with a 112 LSA and no bigger than the cam specs that I have (and many others too), although Dynatek may be able to work with bigger cams.
Reply With Quote