View Single Post
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2009, 12:13 PM
Dan40 Dan40 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 1,120
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excaliber View Post
So what part of the Wikipedia definition is inaccurate, in your opinion Dan40, or anyone else for that matter?

Is it the gag reflex you question? Lung damage? Brain damage due to lack of oxygen? Death? Broken bones? What part would you like removed so the women and children can more readily accept a definition that favors the torturer?

Strange, I don't see Cheney or his peer's editing the Wikipedia definition to make it more acceptable. Maybe someone here would like to step up to the plate and handle that right away, since it's SO EASY to edit.
Once again, FROM their website:

Welcome to Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.


That means, it is NOT a source of reliable information. Therefore it is useless, unless you prefer its propaganda.

Lung damage? Cite one case. To my knowledge, NO liberals HAVE or attempted to cite a single case.

Brain damage due to lack of oxygen? Same as above. If it were a liberal, how would one determine that "brain" damage had occurred?

Death? No cases cited, even by far left liberals

Broken bones? Same as above.

Water boarding is NOT intended to harm anyone. It is a more physical method of sleep deprivation. Both are used to exhaust and disorient the subject, so that his thought processes and reasoning are TEMPORARILY disrupted. [makes the terrorist think as logically as a liberal]