View Single Post
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2009, 06:58 AM
RedEsprit RedEsprit is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 742 / 428 FE
Posts: 329
Not Ranked     
Default

Fighting Legislation In Arizona

Quote:
Sam Crump, an Arizona assemblyman who is opposed to the speed cameras and has backed legislation to have them removed from the state's freeways in 2010, says the main backing for speed cameras within Arizona has come from "senior citizens groups," but there has been a surprising agreement between his core conservative followers and college students over privacy concerns.

"It's been the subject of some debate since we introduced it and some legislators have been surprised by the controversy," Crump said. "We expect it to come up for a vote in the next couple weeks. If it fails, we'll say more power to the people. But every time [a freeway speed-camera initiative] has been up for a vote in any place it has failed."

Arizona's former governor, Janet Napolitano, predicted Arizona's freeway camera system would generate $90 million in profit for the state in 2009, and $34 million for the private company that runs it. Crump, however says the system's total profit has been in the range of "$20 to $25 million a year," which leads him to suggest that speed camera detractors who say it's only a device to make money could be wrong.

"I caution people that it really is technology in the hands of Big Brother," Crump said. "We've got 70 or so [freeway speed cameras] right now, and they're looking at [a total of] 200."
As you will notice, Napolitano doesn't say anything about how many lives will be saved with speed cameras. Its all about $90 million in profit. Its all about the revenue. So if your in Arizona and on a back desert highway with no one in sight other than a Gila Monster or tarantula, keep the leash on your Cobra.

Last edited by RedEsprit; 06-03-2009 at 07:03 AM..
Reply With Quote