Quote:
Originally Posted by VRM
You can be pulled over without proof of being drunk.
They would still have to give them a sobriety test.
|
WITH probable cause.On PUBLIC property.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VRM
Bill,
You almost posted your edit after my response. Just as a warning - the mods frown on that sort of thing.
You originally asked where is the proof, and that is the reason for my response above.
Steve
|
I'll edit what i want,when i want and where i want-got it?
You still have given no proof
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsstnotch
this is one I have no problem with.....
If it keeps some idiot drunk driver from killing someone... all the better!
|
Then you are a communist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VRM
True, but the 4th states 'unreasonable searches and seizures'. I think most courts would find it reasonable to pull someone over for bad driving or slurred speech at a drive-through.
Steve
|
Really?ANd sitting in a drive thru just how can you tell the difference between someone who has been drinking,someone on the verge of a diabetic "incident".Or someone who has been on a train for 18 hours straight and has been up 28 hours?
Who ever is this "Good" step forward.
And no the courts would not approve.There is NO probable cause to make the stop.Absolutely no evidence of alcohol consumption while at the drive thru.
ANd one more thing:If you were a business owner,would you want to be known in the community as helping the cops in a sting operation?