Quote:
Originally Posted by cobra bill
I never said to get rid of them, they need to be put back in their place, this is not what the founding fathers had in mind, they had to come under review every 2 years and if they were found to be not beneficial to the country they would lose the corporate status, they are now arguing for personhood, so they can have free reign of campaign financing, as a first amendment right, this is dangerous and needs to be stopped. The way the supreme court is stacked in favor of the corporations, this will be set as president and that, will be judicial activism.
|
Pretty hard to restrict Corporations with these around:
lib·er·al (l
b
r-
l, l
b
r
l)
adj.
1. a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.
d. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States.
[Cut and pasted from online dictionary.]
I find it hard to blame corporations for the fact that politicians will sell their integrity, their votes, and their country for money, or power, or prestige, or fame, or sex.
You want to stop corporate influence? JAIL people like Frank and Rangel. And many, many others! Take away their bribe earned funds, and lock them away for a long time. Cancel the Gold plated retirement and health care programs they voted for themselves. Make it more expensive in every way to be dishonest. Since we cannot instill HONOR in our politicians, instill FEAR!