 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
| 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
| 15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
| 22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
| 29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|

03-25-2010, 11:16 AM
|
 |
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,592
|
|
Not Ranked
|

03-25-2010, 11:39 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
|
Rod,
You dug out the info so I reached out by PM to Owen to join in. Always happy to learn something new-especially about 980HP.  This could really help OP.
__________________
Chas.
|

03-25-2010, 12:24 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham #570 w Shelby FE
Posts: 1,009
|
|
Not Ranked
There was another member here doing a boss 429 that I exchanged a few PM's with quite a while ago... Name escapes me though.
Did anyone look at those 820 monsters? 1800+HP 
|

03-25-2010, 06:13 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronbo
Did anyone look at those 820 monsters? 1800+HP 
|
IHRA Pro Stock is not suitable for a trip to the haberdasher... 
__________________
Chas.
|

03-25-2010, 06:27 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Avon,
NY
Cobra Make, Engine: 1969 Mustang Fastback Pro-Street, constantly changing ongoing project!
Posts: 746
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERA Chas
IHRA Pro Stock is not suitable for a trip to the haberdasher... 
|
Chas, It works for me!
__________________
Mick
(Of The Troops & For The Troops)
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body; but rather a skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, WHAT A RIDE!"
|

03-26-2010, 09:16 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ATL-SAV,
GA
Cobra Make, Engine: Yard Dog FFR 521, 572 Fire Ant Mongrel Cobra 393, 566, Boss 600 hemi , RCR40 #13 348
Posts: 158
|
|
Not Ranked
Hi Guys
My Boss 9 (600) is being put into a Cobra that started out as an FFR MKIII. Modifications complete and planned have changed that to mongrel Cobra, however the important areas for engine fit are still FFR.
The firewall, pass footbox, and steering link require no changes.
The driver footbox is a minor problem. When the Boss 9 was in the chassis for header construction, the standard footbox worked fine - the Boss 9 heads make it easier by pointing the exhaust port more straight down, away from the footbox. The valve covers are another matter. They should fit without footbox modification, or with some minor bending. Unfortunately, for removal, they must swing out at the lower flange, then be lifted off the top. On my car it will mean fabricating a wedge shaped part that will be installed in the footbox at the lower edge of the valve cover. There does not appear to be any obstruction inside the footbox. You may be able to avoid this mod by using hydraulic lifters and getting it right on an engine dyno.
As to hood clearance, the manifold, carb, throttle body, breather or the absence of one will influence what is possible. The Victor-style manifold and a dominator carb, no breather, will be too tall, but a custom scoop could be fabed. Any manifold from a Boss 9 will fit Kaase heads, but some of the originals can be expensive. One option that seems promising is stack injection. Kaase has my TWM manifold for a P51 setup and is looking at casting something similar for the Boss 9. Clearance will depend on port location.
The Boss 9 that made 980 hp is currently torn down for modification. Pistons were ordered based on the first prototype casting - the design evolution continued- valves were moved for flow - and my engine drifted away from the plan. So, new pistons and modified heads - more like the ones he built for his Third Place Engine Masters entry - are on the way.
Hope this helps
|

03-26-2010, 09:48 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Hey John, thanks for responding and sharing.
I'm amazed at what does NOT need modifying on an FFR-but this is still a considerable challenge. Don't know about ERA's KMP's, SPF's etc.
Might have missed it but is yours an iron or aluminum block?
I understand that an engine project of this scope can lead down a winding and costly road until the combination jells. Jon the best guy for the job.
I see you don't post often but if time permits please update this thread and maybe a few engine/chassis photos.
Thanks for sharing.
__________________
Chas.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|