Continuation Cobras & SAAC

[RodKnock]

You started with three...

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Facts, law and World Registry.

OOPS! Lost one of those pegs on your chair...no Registry anymore.

Originally Posted by REAL 1

The facts and law do.

What facts? If it's not an original, then it's a replica. And if it's a replica, and it obviously is, then it can't be genuine, real or authentic. Those are the facts.

[REAL 1]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

You started with three...



OOPS! Lost one of those pegs on your chair...no Registry anymore.



What facts? If it's not an original, then it's a replica. And if it's a replica, and it obviously is, then it can't be genuine, real or authentic. Those are the facts.

Thinks so? Based on what the "3000 Registar" said above Obviously doesn't take much for you to buy in. There's un-biased opinion. If Ned wants to tell you the sky is pink and if you want to buy it go right ahead. A "3000 Registar" can't change facts and law nor does it seem the statements of "his" club (then or now) even comport with his current statements. But if it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy following the "3000 Registar" have at it.

Not me.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Thinks so?

Not me.

"Me" doesn't have a single thing to do with the Registry, which you have always relied on to support your weak, and now weakening, position.

A replica cannot be genuine.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Thinks so? Based on what the "3000 Registar" said There's un-biased opinion.

Not me.

Remember, "SAAC's position," per Ned.

[REAL 1]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

Remember, "SAAC's position," per Ned.

Gee then SAAC should immediately correct the Registry and their statement on their Web site as "per Ned". Still reads consistently 7 years later.

In the meantime, I'll go with the current SAAC statement on their website and the Registry.

You can go with Ned.



P.S. A "replica" can be genuine. Sure it can. Read the Registry.

[A-Snake]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

In the meantime, I'll go with the current SAAC statement on their website and the Registry.

Curious...what statement on their website? Do you have a link for it?

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Gee then SAAC should immediately correct the Registry and their statement on their Web site as "per Ned". Still reads consistently 7 years later.

In the meantime, I'll go with the current SAAC statement on their website and the Registry.

You can go with Ned.



P.S. A "replica" can be genuine. Sure it can. Read the Registry.

I didn't know SAAC publishes a Registry every week, month or even every year? You do realize that publishing the Registry is a monumental task done by volunteers. They publish roughly every decade, if I remember correctly.

Anyway, definitions can change over time. New words are created all the time. The dictionary and Wiki change constantly.

But one thing is for sure. A replica cannot be genuine. That is pure unadulterated logic. And I'll stick with logic.

[jhv48]

He sure gets pissy when the facts turn against him.

Good job, guys! You yank on the strings, and we get to watch him dance.

This thread took an ugly turn a few pages ago. Knives, watches, etc. Glad it finally got back on track. The defense never rests.