| Chaplin |
06-19-2007 11:48 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roscoe
And believe it or not that is gelcoat. Eight years on the road and never been painted yet. Just the way it came from A&C.
Roscoe
|
I know it's still gel coat (because you're too cheap to get it painted) :p And it does look good.
|
| CobraEd |
06-19-2007 12:02 PM |
A&C Gelcoat
And with the gelcoat A&Cs, if you put them upside down in the water, they will float. :rolleyes:
.
|
| Roscoe |
06-19-2007 02:32 PM |
Now now Ed........Let's behave........Hey wait a minute.....if I had a 427 block in there I'd have my own boat anchor.
Roscoe
|
| 427PMS |
06-19-2007 03:06 PM |
|
| FUNFER2 |
06-20-2007 04:32 PM |
Jamo- perfect stance ! Nice & level. :cool:
|
| Cobra #3170 |
06-20-2007 05:11 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by computerworks
Actually..there were three configurations of the rear shape:
The Comp cars and most of the street cars were what is known now as 'wide-hip'... broad rear wings with no flare.
The S/Cs had a 1-inch flare pounded into them before paint for street use, but they were Comp cars with wide hip to begin with
And finally, the 'narrow-hip' was a design change that lasted only for a few dozen street cars in the first production run. After they changed over to street production, they tried to minimize the size of the rear fenders, since the street-sized tires left a lot of "air" in the wheel arch opening. A few dozen were built that way...but it didn't look as good as the old way, so they switched back. The 'narrow-hip' had no flare either.
|
Actually there was a fourth shape, my car was a "wide hip" car and I ordered it with flared fenders, Shelby moved the outer surface outboard but did not add the SC right angle at the wheel opening. I don't know how many cars were done like this but I have had racing tires with a 13.5 " cross-section on with only slight contact with the square tube at the front of the inner fender.
I used to run the Goodyear transAm slicks that were used on Mustangs in the late 60's and early 70's. The rims were the stock factory 9.5" Hallibrands. I believe the tires were about 26.5 tall with a 12" tread and a 13.5 section width, they would probably rub on an original SC.. I would also caution against setting ride heights to get the right look, chassis rake angle has a major effect on roll couple distribution and can really cause major handling issues if it is wrong.
|
| 1985 CCX |
06-20-2007 06:04 PM |
|
jamo
how much did you lower your car it looks great.:)
|
| Chaplin |
06-20-2007 07:30 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNFER2
Jamo- perfect stance ! Nice & level. :cool:
|
Until he sits in it :p :)
|
| computerworks |
06-20-2007 07:33 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by redd
Jamo - how much did you lower your car it looks great.:)
|
Chappie...I purposely wasn't touching that line.... :o
|
| Chaplin |
06-20-2007 07:35 PM |
I'm not opposed to picking low hanging fruit! ;)
|
| Danr55 |
06-20-2007 08:50 PM |
1 Attachment(s)
An older Contemporary. Much like Jeff's car.
|
Chappie, Ron...you can both bite my a$$.
|
| Cobra #3170 |
06-21-2007 12:54 AM |
Pictures
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1985 CCX
#3170
Could you add some photos to your gallery? I am sure it would be appreciated by more than myself. Thanks......
CCX rear end: I am running 26.5 x 10.5 Goodyears on the back and it does not rub at all.
|
OK, pictures are posted, thanks for asking. 26.5 is a good diameter I have to run 25" diameter to get the width and compound I want but would prefer 26.5
I run a 25x12.5x16 in the rear and a 23.5x11x16 in front
|
| 1985 CCX |
06-21-2007 04:24 AM |
#3170,
Thanks for posting some pics, it is always great to se another early car.
Chappie,
You are right, I don't add to the looks at all.......LOLOL:LOL:
Jeff
|
| greg schroeder |
06-22-2007 02:47 PM |
I've only seen a handful of original Cobras, three in person and maybe a dozen on line. It seems they have all sorts of shape fenders and lips on the rear. One I remember even had both sides that looked diffrent from each other.
I'm pretty happy with my Superformance look.
|
| Rob. Smith |
06-29-2007 06:22 AM |
The truth to the Cobra body shape is that they were all "rough beaten" and even each side wasn't identical. Each model was different and each modified version didn't have the same shapes. SO.... your Cobra is unique just like the originals. (as long as you don't add wings or pointy bits ! )
|
| TButtrick |
06-29-2007 07:02 AM |
|
| double ugly |
07-16-2007 07:18 PM |
No one bought Hi Tech after Tim Gunning went bankrupt in the 90s. A new company in Texas is the 21st century Hi Tech using a carbon Fiber body with very accurate detailing. Roger Bolick is the owner of the company and isn't giving any information yet re: the name of the company.
John
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:40 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: