Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   ALL COBRA TALK (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/)
-   -   3.3 sec. 0 - 60. Completely stock (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/all-cobra-talk/85086-3-3-sec-0-60-completely-stock.html)

CobraEd 02-07-2008 12:19 PM

3.3 sec. 0 - 60. Completely stock
 
Faster than the new Vette & Viper.

YouTube - Nissan GT-R: World´s 1st Full Test - Inside Line Exclusive


.

mpanten 02-07-2008 01:10 PM

Looks like a combination of an Aston Martin and a Supra. Not fan of Nissans but it's hard to argue with the performance for the price. 11.6 quarters off the shelf for 70k. Not to shabby.

Dennis Kelley 02-07-2008 02:36 PM

Launch control is for people who don't know how to drive. Nice car I just don't want all the electronics. I wonder how many launches it will take before the Diff or tranny cries foul.
later
dennis

Excaliber 02-07-2008 02:45 PM

It's actually a Nissan "Skyline" which has pretty much been a legend within the 'tuner' and 'drifter' community for many years. There are a couple of them in Hawaii, and I gotta tell ya, when I see one they get my respect. They have always been absolute cutting edge in performance but this now one really up's the anti. 4 wheel drive AND 4 wheel steering as well. Twin turbo V6, not sure of the horse power but no doubt 500 +. The early Skylines ran a pretty awesome straight 6, I don't know much about this new V6 motor.

Skyline, quietly kicking a$$ since the 70's when it was introduced as a fast 'grocery getter' and moderate sedan (wolf in sheeps clothing).

Silverback51 02-07-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dennis Kelley (Post 812782)
Launch control is for people who don't know how to drive. Nice car I just don't want all the electronics. I wonder how many launches it will take before the Diff or tranny cries foul.
later
dennis

I agree.

It's kind of like my wife's Jeep SRT8. It's quick, but all you have to do is stab the throttle and point it in the right direction. Everything else is taken care of.

Kind of boring in my opinion.:(

jwd 02-07-2008 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dennis Kelley (Post 812782)
Launch control is for people who don't know how to drive. dennis


Unfortunately, that includes about 99% of the drivers out there, even though most think they are somehow related to Mario Andretti. How many have actually graduated from a performance driving school?
I recently read that the vast majority of cars that had traction control/active handling that were involved in a 1 car crash, had it turned off.
:rolleyes:

Hexnut72 02-07-2008 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excaliber (Post 812783)
It's actually a Nissan "Skyline" which has pretty much been a legend within the 'tuner' and 'drifter' community for many years. There are a couple of them in Hawaii, and I gotta tell ya, when I see one they get my respect. They have always been absolute cutting edge in performance but this now one really up's the anti. 4 wheel drive AND 4 wheel steering as well. Twin turbo V6, not sure of the horse power but no doubt 500 +. The early Skylines ran a pretty awesome straight 6, I don't know much about this new V6 motor.

Skyline, quietly kicking a$$ since the 70's when it was introduced as a fast 'grocery getter' and moderate sedan (wolf in sheeps clothing).

I think they are dropping the Skyline name and just calling GT-R.

SkipB 02-07-2008 05:20 PM

You know, it is interesting about the fear of too many electronic devices in cars. Most provide increased comfort, control and in the case of this new Nissan, much improved performance. Hopefully they never fail, because diagnosing the problem is often near impossible. But, my experience with Japanese cars is that they just don't break! Better engineering, better quality parts, I am not sure what they do differently? I contrast my wife's Infiiniti with loads of electronics (absolutely no problems after many miles) to her previous BMW which had shall we say "electronic issues". What is it about Japanese stuff? Why can't other manufacturers duplicate their reliabliity? I just don't get it!

SkipB

Excaliber 02-07-2008 05:30 PM

Hexnut72, good point and I think rightfully so. The new car certainly has it's roots in the Skyline, but it's so 'over the top' and different enough it deserves a modified name.

When I was working for Ford and Chrysler dealerships those 'older' Lincolns and big Chryslers were an absolute nightmare of electrical problems as age caught up with them, and it didn't take that long! :D

JCoop 02-07-2008 05:36 PM

Holy Cow! Actually, the YouTube comments were more entertaining than the video...

Dinobyte 02-07-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkipB (Post 812844)
...I am not sure what they do differently? I contrast my wife's Infiiniti with loads of electronics (absolutely no problems after many miles) to her previous BMW which had shall we say "electronic issues". What is it about Japanese stuff? Why can't other manufacturers duplicate their reliabliity? I just don't get it!

SkipB


SIX SIGMA...wtih TQM and TPI

They incent their people for quality, not quantity/crap.

Dinobyte 02-07-2008 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkipB (Post 812844)
...I am not sure what they do differently? I contrast my wife's Infiiniti with loads of electronics (absolutely no problems after many miles) to her previous BMW which had shall we say "electronic issues". What is it about Japanese stuff? Why can't other manufacturers duplicate their reliabliity? I just don't get it!

SkipB


SIX SIGMA...wtih Total Quality Management and Continuous Process Improvement

They incent their people for quality, not quantity/crap.

CSX 4039 02-07-2008 11:03 PM

Faster, same price, can be registered, less practical, more fun?
YouTube - Top Gear: Atom

undy 02-08-2008 04:06 AM

Something's fishy with the stats. The power to weight ratio just ain't there.

It's a real porker @ around 4K lbs and t's only rated @ 470 hp too. Either Nissan sent a wicked up "ringer" for testing and press debut or they're severely under rated out of the box. Being turbo'd it'll be simple to crank up the boost and get even more stupid fast. Time will tell where they place in the pecking order. I'll look forward to a "casual" meeting with one in the Z.. (on the track, of course!);)

mpanten 02-08-2008 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undy (Post 812971)
Something's fishy with the stats. The power to weight ratio just ain't there.

It's a real porker @ around 4K lbs and t's only rated @ 470 hp too. Either Nissan sent a wicked up "ringer" for testing and press debut or they're severely under rated out of the box. Being turbo'd it'll be simple to crank up the boost and get even more stupid fast. Time will tell where they place in the pecking order. I'll look forward to a "casual" meeting with one in the Z.. (on the track, of course!);)

That is what Traction Control can do for you. When all you have to do is rev it up to 4 grand and let off the brake your 0-60 and quarter mile times are going to be pretty impressive.

CobraEd 02-08-2008 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undy (Post 812971)
Something's fishy with the stats. The power to weight ratio just ain't there.

It's a real porker @ around 4K lbs and t's only rated @ 470 hp too. Either Nissan sent a wicked up "ringer" for testing and press debut or they're severely under rated out of the box. Being turbo'd it'll be simple to crank up the boost and get even more stupid fast. Time will tell where they place in the pecking order. I'll look forward to a "casual" meeting with one in the Z.. (on the track, of course!);)

Maybe the cars in japan do not have catalitic converters, and do not need to be tuned for emissions ??? I dunno.

Also, almost all of the reason for the good numbers is because of the amazing launch capability. AWD with an automatic is the best combo out there for an amazing launch. I'll be they are not so good from a roll. So only race them from a roll and you got it made.


.

Excaliber 02-08-2008 09:05 AM

Is that 470 WHEEL horse power or flywheel horse power? I would assume the power loss due to four wheel drive and auto trans would be significant from flywheel to tires. Which would mean some serious flywheel h.p.

mpanten 02-08-2008 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excaliber (Post 813040)
Is that 470 WHEEL horse power or flywheel horse power? I would assume the power loss due to four wheel drive and auto trans would be significant from flywheel to tires. Which would mean some serious flywheel h.p.

Does anyone know how you would calculate the parasitic loss for an awd vehicle?

clayfoushee 02-08-2008 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excaliber (Post 813040)
Is that 470 WHEEL horse power or flywheel horse power? I would assume the power loss due to four wheel drive and auto trans would be significant from flywheel to tires. Which would mean some serious flywheel h.p.

Flywheel.

The GT-R numbers are fishy, and the power/weight ratio doesn't support them. However, there have been multiple bone stock Z06s in the 10s, with very, very good drivers. The Z06 is difficult to launch properly, which is why the magazine times are much higher than they are with very experienced drivers.

undy 02-08-2008 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excaliber (Post 813040)
Is that 470 WHEEL horse power or flywheel horse power? I would assume the power loss due to four wheel drive and auto trans would be significant from flywheel to tires. Which would mean some serious flywheel h.p.


That's flywheel horse power, not wheel. AWD helps for 60ft times and is a power consuming hinderance pretty much after that, 1/4 mile wise. I don't remember what the trap speed was. That's usually and indicator of ram horse power. The stock to intake'n tune Z06s are running between 125 to 130 trap speeds.

Traction control on typically makes things slower, not faster. Maybe AWD's the exception??


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: