|
I'm suddenly a bit confused. The RTA forms and Dept of Infrastructure websites SUTI form all mention ADR 10/01 as the most recent. Where has the requirement for 10/02 come from? I didn't realise it was in force yet, just that it was a current ADR?
Cheers, Treeve p.s. as a side note Dave, telecoms for 50 years? do you send your SMS messages in Morse Code? ... _ _ _ ... :) |
Quote:
Since that time my taste has matured from the street thug Cobra to the smaller hooligan 7 :LOL: ADR 10-02 came in mid last year for all new vehicles, my 2010 Forester TD is not compliant because it is a continuation of the existing body shape. |
With all these restrictions and falling sales of 'kits', I wonder how many manufacturers will survive the next 12 months?
|
Quote:
It's not just about the Cobra, GT40 or Clubbie market, ultimately it will affect every business that sells equipment to repair or modify a car, Whiteline, Supercheap, Rare Spares, Castlemaine Rod Shop, Jap importers, Hoppers Stoppers all the dyno shops etc. The NSW requested amendments will also hit the rodders of both types as well, a guy who works for me put an electric motor in a Mondeo. An engine swap makes that an ICV under the new NCOP if NSW get their way. The new engineering scheme VSCCS deregisters all existing engineers who then have a short period of time to apply and maybe accepted, the local engineers are up in arms and I don't see the interstaters taking it up because of the cost which will make any interstate stuff harder. Have a look at your local council by-laws and see how much work you can do on your car in your garage. Check the oil and top up the water and not much else. My 7 is the fourth car I've built in my garage since the 80's plus some serious mods with my kids ( Datto 1200 ute with 350 RWKw ) but the first one I've tried to register and I now wish I'd registered one of the earlier ones. [/rant] |
kit manufacturers
Quote:
If the kit manufacturers don't get on board and follow up on these changes they shouldn't be in the business. Most of these guys would know what stage of the build we are up to with their particular kits, maybe they should become more supportive. Our recommendations form a large part of their continued business and we do continue to buy parts from them during the build. |
Sorry All,
I phrased my question really badly (partly because I was already aware of the answer). modifications to ADR 10/02 was tabled at the Senate (and I ssume passed since it is listed on the government legislation website) in July 2010. To original 10/02 was in 2008. However, the point I failed to make clear: The RTA require vehicles in NSW to be manufactured to forms which have not been updated and still show 10/01; they have not adopted the newer versions of the ADR's for ICV's* So, my point is: when did the RTA announce that this was the new rule, and update their publicly available documentation to allow us all (builders, hobbyists, owners, manufacturers etc) to be aware of the new requirement? There's so many different sides to the ADR / NCOP / VSB application argument that I'm pretty sure I can see the back of my own head. Cheers, Treeve * (at least if they have, it wasn't clear to me - and I do ask people to prove me wrong; it's better that we all learn something rather than just believe what we read on the internet...). |
Quote:
|
as I said - so many facets that I'm starting to feel confused by it all.
Where do we start? With the RTA and DoI forms. Where do we end? __________ (fill in your own blanks because I've had the RTA refer me to an engineer who referred me to the DoI, who answered me, which I forwarded to the engineer, who referred me back to the RTA who said "ask the engineer again"....). Thus began the seatbelt saga of ADR 4/04 and 5/05. (p.s. the DoI are happy to accept harnesses. ADR 4/04 makes allowances for them. Neither NCOP does though). As Zedn pointed out, it's been messed up by so many people not following procedure that there is no procedure left to follow. Treeve |
There are stories about that some of the manufacturers are closing up or reducing their businesses to parts supply.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
F**k it - Im moving to the NT with Dave. |
Quote:
Depending on the legislation that empowers the RTA the decisions made by them can be reviewed by the Administrative Descisions Tribunal (NSW) Decisions made in administration of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 are reviewable but the ROAD TRANSPORT (VEHICLE REGISTRATION) REGULATIONS 2000 are not listed (so maybe a specific enquiry) Administrative Decisions Tribunal of NSW - Adminstrative Decisions Tribunal : Lawlink NSW However, if your state govt is looking at the RTA then it might be a good time to remind the transport minister or your local member that oversight/review of these matters might be a good thing and provide an avenue for getting complaints off his desk... who knows LB |
Provision for appeal is under the Road Transport (General) Regulation 2005. Part 3 Division 2.
Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Authority under the Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Regulation 2007 to refuse to issue an examiner’s authority or a proprietor’s authority or to suspend or cancel such an authority, being a decision notified to the person under clause 64 of that Regulation, may appeal against the decision to the Local Court by lodging a notice of appeal with the Court not later than 21 days after being so notified. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think you are both talking about different companies. PRB and DRB
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now neither are making road kits, age could have as much to do with it as rego problems though. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: