Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
May 2024
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
03-27-2010, 09:18 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eagle,
Ne.
Cobra Make, Engine: 1966 Lone Star 427SC.
Posts: 4,305
|
|
Not Ranked
Genesis ALUM. Block Owners. Please Check In.
{Update- I don't think I'll be 100% happy with a iron block. This magazine side oiler build from the start, is about the 60's version compared to the new aluminum 2010 side oiler. I've done so much work to this point, so I don't think I can "settle",.... for the iron.)
I guess Tim of Genesis, may not be making aluminum blocks at this time ?
What do you owners think of your Genesis iron blocks.
Any bad issues ?
What year is it ?
What CI ?
What bore & stroke ?
Type of cam ? (I'm thinking a mechanical roller)
Brand of lifters ? (If a roller)
ect.....
1st- I was set with a 482 CI. but, I can go up to a 527 CI.
What's your thoughts with the following ?
This will be a radical driver, not a dedicated track car.
Not abused but, smash the pedal and have fun.
Pump gas. (8 + mpg)
Don't mind lashing the valves, need being.
Performance, is of course the meaning of a Cobra, but sound is equally of importance.
2nd- Tell me about your Genesis. Don't be shy with the good & the ugly.
__________________
Regards,
Kevin
Last edited by FUNFER2; 03-28-2010 at 11:05 AM..
Reason: Change from iron to aluminum
|
-
Advertising
03-28-2010, 04:49 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va & Port Charlotte, Fl.,
Posts: 2,281
|
|
Not Ranked
One word... h-e-a-v-y, more so than an OEM iron block. Don't compromise now Kev, when the light at the end of the tunnel is now visible. Get a line of credit that mama doesn't know about,,
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNFER2
I guess Tim of Genesis, may not be making aluminum blocks at this time ?
I thought a alum. side oiler was going to reside in my cobra, but a engine builder said their not as plentiful now so, he suggested his iron block. He also said I may be happier with the latter for several reasons. This is not a debate of iron vs alum. so, I'll get on with it.
What do you owners think of your Genesis iron blocks.
Any bad issues ?
What year is it ?
What CI ?
What bore & stroke ?
Type of cam ? (I'm thinking a mechanical roller)
Brand of lifters ? (If a roller)
ect.....
1st- I was set with a 482 CI. but, I can go up to a 527 CI.
What's your thoughts with the following ?
This will be a radical driver, not a dedicated track car.
Not abused but, smash the pedal and have fun.
Pump gas. (8 + mpg)
Don't mind lashing the valves, need being.
Performance, is of course the meaning of a Cobra, but sound is equally of importance.
2nd- Tell me about your Genesis. Don't be shy with the good & the ugly.
|
__________________
Too many toys?? never!
|
03-28-2010, 05:38 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tampa,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427 - #783
Posts: 173
|
|
Not Ranked
__________________
Mooch
ERA Registry Map
If you have an ERA and want to be listed, contact me with your info and I'll put it up. The minimum info I need is chassis number and location. The rest is up to you. The most information needed would be: chassis number, body type, city, name, CC nickname, and email address.
|
03-28-2010, 06:42 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Little Rock area,
AR
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA Street Roadster #782 with 459 cu in FE KC engine, toploader, 3.31
Posts: 4,488
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by undy
|
At least making it a 527 would save a little weight.
|
03-28-2010, 06:48 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: centralia,
IL
Cobra Make, Engine: B&B cobra (sold), Hurricane HMS1002 (sold), Kirkham 289 FIA, (sold) RCR GT 40(sold) SPF GT40 2122(sold) Hurricane HMS2002, (sold) RCR SLC (sold) GTR on the way!
Posts: 1,288
|
|
Not Ranked
When we were deciding which way to go on my new project, my builder talked with quite a few builders that had issues with the cam journals not running parallel with the crank. I'm not sure if its true or not, just reporting what I heard. I went with Pond Aluminum and I am very happy.
__________________
High Maintenance Racing Team
Run & Gun 2003 - 2013
|
03-28-2010, 09:46 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eagle,
Ne.
Cobra Make, Engine: 1966 Lone Star 427SC.
Posts: 4,305
|
|
Not Ranked
That's funny undy.
I guess I did not know there was a weight difference. How much more ?
__________________
Regards,
Kevin
|
03-28-2010, 10:01 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va & Port Charlotte, Fl.,
Posts: 2,281
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNFER2
That's funny undy.
I guess I did not know there was a weight difference. How much more ?
|
Sorry Kev, can't help myself sometimes...
I believe there was a thread or two over on fordfe that said somewhere around 30lbs +/- heavier than an OEM iron. But it's a heck of a lot stronger too
__________________
Too many toys?? never!
|
03-28-2010, 10:36 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sacramento,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 707, 446ci FE
Posts: 1,115
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanEC
At least making it a 527 would save a little weight.
|
These huge-bore variations make me think of the old crack about motorcycle engines: "Bore it out one more time and you'll have a stack of washers!"
__________________
= Si Opus Quadratum vis, angulos praecidere noli. =
|
03-28-2010, 10:45 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eagle,
Ne.
Cobra Make, Engine: 1966 Lone Star 427SC.
Posts: 4,305
|
|
Not Ranked
yeah,...yeah,.... Dave lol
Like I just said in my pm to you. I wish I could edit my post heading from iron to aluminum. From the start of this magazine build is supposed to be about the 60's side oiler as a comparison to todays modern 2010 aluminum side oiler.
I know I will not be happy with a iron block, especially with all the time & work I've put in. Now is not the time to "settle"...... for a iron motor.
Do you agree ?
(Maybe I should delete this post and start a new one with aluminum in the heading.
__________________
Regards,
Kevin
Last edited by FUNFER2; 03-28-2010 at 11:18 AM..
|
03-28-2010, 11:08 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eagle,
Ne.
Cobra Make, Engine: 1966 Lone Star 427SC.
Posts: 4,305
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner
These huge-bore variations make me think of the old crack about motorcycle engines: "Bore it out one more time and you'll have a stack of washers!"
|
lol
What bore size would turn your crank, with your next engine,...482 ?
__________________
Regards,
Kevin
|
03-28-2010, 11:29 AM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
|
|
Not Ranked
First, I would check with the engine builders on this site about boring the Genesis block to 527. I haven't heard of a member here boring that big with a Genesis or Pond block. The only block that I've heard going that big is the big bore Shelby block.
Second, the Pond aluminum block will save you about 125 lbs over an OEM FE. The Shelby block will save you about 100 lbs over an OEM FE block. I believe I'm reasonably close on those figures, but double check me.
Third, while Barry R loves to use the Genesis block, from what I've read, many others have run into problems with them. On the other hand, "xl8or", Scott, used the Genesis block and seemed to have no problems at all.
Fourth, the Genesis block is about $1,000 less than the Pond block and about $1,600 less than the CSX block. So, upgrading to aluminum is not cheap, but then removing 100-125 +/- pounds and increasing the resale value of the car are two advantages of the aluminum block.
Fifth, an aluminum block makes it easier to spot leaks.
|
03-28-2010, 11:40 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Voerde,
NRW
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 13
|
|
Not Ranked
There is no need to bore a new block to the maximum. More than 4.31 canīt be done with an genesis or pond aluminum block I think.
With an aluminum block > go with 482 CUI (or 468 CUI if you prefer the shorter 4.125 stroke like me).
With an iron block > same as aluminum or 496 CUI (4.31 bore / 4.25 stroke).
Greetings from germany, Stefan
Last edited by silverline; 03-28-2010 at 01:32 PM..
|
03-28-2010, 12:11 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eagle,
Ne.
Cobra Make, Engine: 1966 Lone Star 427SC.
Posts: 4,305
|
|
Not Ranked
I think,.... the 527 is the maximum they can be bored to I know the Shelby has much more meat but, the price is incredible. Also, like with any engine, the more troubles you can encounter with very large bores.
The walls are much thinner.
If you hurt a cylinder, the block is done.
If a rebuild is needed, sleeves are needed.
Increased heat.
Of course, it's more expensive.
ect....
I guess I'll have to sell the shirt off my back, to pay for a Pond or Shelby aluminum block.
I do have many sponsors for this magazine build but, the block is hard to swallow and takes up a lot of my budget.
Anyway, since I'm back from the dark side, with the ALUMINUM block. Talk to me about the parts used and the specifications or your motor.
Is there anything you would change ?
Why do you like yours so much ?
__________________
Regards,
Kevin
|
03-28-2010, 01:18 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary, FE, Tremec TKO 600
Posts: 1,952
|
|
Not Ranked
Kevin,
Just in case you haven't been told, you can NOT bore the Genesis aluminum block anywhere near as much as you can their cast iron block. It's much more limited in bore capacity.
|
03-28-2010, 01:30 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Voerde,
NRW
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 13
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNFER2
Anyway, since I'm back from the dark side, with the ALUMINUM block. Talk to me about the parts used and the specifications or your motor.
Is there anything you would change ?
Why do you like yours so much ?
|
My Keith Craft 468FE is right now in progress:
Pond iron block w/ 4.25 bore
KCR 4340 forged crank w/ 4.125 stroke
KCR 4340 H-Beam rods w/ ARP2000 upgrade
Ebrock Stage-2 heads
Ebrock performer RPM intake
Comp cams solid flat tappet cam
Erson roller rockers
QFT 750 cfm mech. sec. carb without choke
Billet double roller timing set
Cometic gaskets
That 14 CUI more with 4.25 stroke would not make a big difference in HP/TQ, enough is enough. And I like the better rod/stroke ratio @ 4.125 stroke and lower piston speed. The ARP2000 upgrade rather isnīt necessary, but safe is safe and the cost not much more.
|
03-28-2010, 01:36 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: centralia,
IL
Cobra Make, Engine: B&B cobra (sold), Hurricane HMS1002 (sold), Kirkham 289 FIA, (sold) RCR GT 40(sold) SPF GT40 2122(sold) Hurricane HMS2002, (sold) RCR SLC (sold) GTR on the way!
Posts: 1,288
|
|
Not Ranked
I am building the same thing. My builder didn't want to build a square moter so we are using the 4.125 crank. The angles are better and if anything, it should ramp up a little faster.
__________________
High Maintenance Racing Team
Run & Gun 2003 - 2013
|
03-28-2010, 01:47 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,588
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlampe
I am building the same thing. My builder didn't want to build a square moter so we are using the 4.125 crank. The angles are better and if anything, it should ramp up a little faster.
|
I was told the 4.25 stroke and 4.25 bore was the way to go, but every builder is different. Some build 496's or Roush offers a 511 FE. Some build the 527.
For someone like Dean who's an accomplished racer the .125 stroke difference may make a difference in "ramping up", but so does using an aluminum flywheel or even starting with few hundred extra lbs that a fiberglass car has versus an aluminum one.
I'm not sure a mere mortal like me would see that .125 stroke difference. Sort of six of one, half-dozen of another.
Enough is enough? Hmmmm. Never been part of human nature.
|
03-28-2010, 03:33 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LAS VEGAS,
NV
Cobra Make, Engine: contemporary(2) one with 427 sohc and one with 427 center oiler
Posts: 491
|
|
Not Ranked
Robert Pond is marketing Iron blocks as well as the aluminum.
At the end of the day its about all of the componets working together ie.bore and stroke,rod ratios(piston dwell at tdc and bdc,sidewall loadings),the ability of your cylinder head to work with the proper cam grind(flow numbers)blueprinting the engine,carburation.exhaust flow,ignition.All of these factors have to work in harmony with each other if not you may be spending money on parts that do little to increase power.The only substitute for cubic inches is more cubic inches but all the parts have to work together.Some engine builders have a formula that works for them and they stick to it but for me part of the fun of building an engine is doing all the research and analizing the methodology of the build.
|
03-28-2010, 09:50 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oakham,
Ma
Cobra Make, Engine: Kirkham 592
Posts: 577
|
|
Not Ranked
I went with barry's recomendation and purchased and iron Genesis block. It ran well on the stand and the car is almost finished. It looks like it will be on the road in a few weeks. The registration may hold up cruising but that's another story.
|
03-29-2010, 01:58 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Voerde,
NRW
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 13
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodKnock
Enough is enough? Hmmmm. Never been part of human nature.
|
As with alcohol.
Driving a cobra with excessive HP / low-end TQ isnīt funny. If youīre realistic, a well made 468 cubic-incher is enough for a light car. Why go the 482 route than (or even more) and not take the shorter stroke advantages? Thereīs nothing wrong with 482 in a cuiser, but no chance in my cobra!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:25 AM.
|